Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Taking the Pill cuts the risk of cancer
The Times (UK) ^ | September 12, 2007 | Nigel Hawkes, Health Editor

Posted on 09/12/2007 6:38:01 PM PDT by neverdem

Times Online Logo 222 x 25

From
September 12, 2007

Taking the Pill cuts the risk of cancer

Pill plus HRT may bring cancer risk | Decade of Pill use doubles risk of cervical cancer

Taking the Pill reduces the risks of a woman getting cancer later in life, according to one of the largest studies ever undertaken.

The conclusion will reassure millions of women who took the Pill 30 or 40 years ago and are now of an age when the risks are growing.

The study found that overall cancer risk was up to 12 per cent lower for women who took the Pill for less than eight years. But, for the minority of women who took it for more than eight years, the news was less good: for them, the risk of cancer increased by 22 per cent.

The risk of developing bowel and rectal, uterine and ovarian cancers was most reduced. There was no evidence that the risk of developing breast cancer either increased or decreased with short-term usage.

“Many women, especially those who used the first generation of oral contraceptives many years ago, are likely to be reassured by our results,” the authors of the new study say. “The cancer benefits of oral contraception outweigh the risks.”

Maria Leadbeater, of Breast Cancer Care, said: “The findings of this research will be welcomed by the thousands of women across the UK who have used, or are currently using, an oral contraceptive.”

The team, from the University of Aberdeen, used data gathered by the Royal College of Physicians since 1968, which asked 1,400 GPs to provide information on women who were taking the Pill, and a matched group who were not. A total of 46,000 women were recruited, aged 29 on average. All were married or in a stable relationship.

The women were then monitored until 2004, and any cancers they developed were recorded.

The team also had more limited data up to 1996 provided by the women’s GPs, giving them two sets of statistics from which to work.

The results, reported in the British Medical Journal, show that the Pill reduced the overall risks of cancer for most women, though the degree of benefit depended on which dataset was used.

Using the main dataset, the team found a reduction of 12 per cent in the risk of getting any cancer. That represents one fewer case of cancer for every 2,200 women who have used the Pill for a year.

The smaller dataset also showed a benefit, but a smaller one: a 3 per cent reduction in overall risk, equivalent to one fewer case for every 10,000 women per year.

The exception was for women who used the Pill for more than eight years – about a quarter of Pill-users. Their risk of cancer was significantly increased. The average Pill user in the research took the contraceptive for 44 months.

Professor Philip Hannaford, who led the research team, said: “These results show that, in this UK cohort, the contraceptive Pill was not associated with an overall increased risk of any cancer; indeed it may produce an important net public health gain.”

About three million women use the Pill each year in Britain and 100 million around the world. More than 300 million women have used the Pill since its launch in 1961.

Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times.

© Copyright 2007 Times Newspapers Ltd.

This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: birthcontrol; bravosierra; cancer; contraceptives; health; medicine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
"Cancer risk among users of oral contraceptives: cohort data from the Royal College of General Practitioner's oral contraception study,"is the title of the article. It's FReebie accessed on the BMJ link.
1 posted on 09/12/2007 6:38:06 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I prefer to think of the pill as reducing the risk of abortion.


2 posted on 09/12/2007 6:41:43 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Greed is NOT a conservative ideal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Well, that settles that! lol

The medical lords have spoken.


3 posted on 09/12/2007 6:43:15 PM PDT by Finalapproach29er (Dems will impeach Bush in 2008; mark my words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

“Taking the Pill reduces the risks of a woman getting cancer later in life, according to one of the largest studies ever undertaken.”

For some reason I don’t believe a word of this.


4 posted on 09/12/2007 6:44:13 PM PDT by annelizly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

barf alert.


5 posted on 09/12/2007 6:45:47 PM PDT by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Every other study that has been done for the past 30 years has shown the pill to increase the risk of several types of cancer in women. Next they’ll be refuting the facts that abortions increase the risk of cancer also


6 posted on 09/12/2007 6:45:50 PM PDT by phil1750 (Love like you've never been hurt;Dance like nobody's watching;PRAY like it's your last prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: phil1750
Every other study that has been done

Great thing about America you can always make up anything you want and call it a fact. Just ask Algore!

7 posted on 09/12/2007 6:57:13 PM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: El Gato; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; tiamat; PGalt; Dianna; ...
Skeletal Discovery Bone Cells Affect Metabolism

Cuba Has Better Health Care than the United States?

Cholera Epidemic Infects 7,000 People in Iraq

FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.

8 posted on 09/12/2007 6:57:40 PM PDT by neverdem (Call talk radio. We need a Constitutional Amendment for Congressional term limits. Let's Roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: balch3
barf alert.

 

why would the news that many woman are not at risk of cancer cause you to hurl

9 posted on 09/12/2007 7:02:34 PM PDT by grjr21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: balch3

So are you coming out in favor of humans only having sex twice in their lives, or for rampant procreation?


10 posted on 09/12/2007 7:04:29 PM PDT by counterpunch (Ron Paul is gearing up to be Hillary Clinton's Ross Perot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: annelizly
From the article-

The study found that overall cancer risk was up to 12 per cent lower for women who took the Pill for less than eight years. But, for the minority of women who took it for more than eight years, the news was less good: for them, the risk of cancer increased by 22 per cent.

So, 8 years is the cut-off point.

11 posted on 09/12/2007 7:10:18 PM PDT by perfect stranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I suppose it certainly cuts the risk of having a dried film of DNA on your back :-)


12 posted on 09/12/2007 7:13:55 PM PDT by Moleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Study either makes no sense or is misleadingly reported. Short term pill use reduced cancer risk 12% later in life. BUT:

Using the pill 8 years or more INCREASED cancer risk twice as much - 22%.

Seems logical to me that 8 years is not a magic cut off point. So if you used the pill 5 years, is your risk up or down? This article says down, I wouldn't bet on it.

13 posted on 09/12/2007 7:14:44 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: balch3

WHY...no barf alert required...please splain...


14 posted on 09/12/2007 7:15:44 PM PDT by Moleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

On it’s face, I’m afraid I don’t find this credible. It sounds like politicized science to me. I wouldn’t trust the report until it has been thoroughly analyzed by people I can trust.


15 posted on 09/12/2007 7:19:14 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
The ‘Pill’ is the perhaps the worst blight to hit mankind in the 20th century.
16 posted on 09/12/2007 7:21:03 PM PDT by Greystoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
That isn't how the pill works. The pill forces menstruation even if there is a fertilized egg implanted in the uterine wall.
17 posted on 09/12/2007 7:35:05 PM PDT by VanShuyten ("Of course, a fool, what with sheer fright and fine sentiments, is always safe.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The headline is a lie. In some instances it lowered risk, after continued use it increased risks.


18 posted on 09/12/2007 8:07:02 PM PDT by weegee (NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

You can prefer to think that the moon is made of cheese but that doesn’t change the fact that the pill is an abortifacient.


19 posted on 09/12/2007 8:23:41 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

**Taking the Pill cuts the risk of cancer**

I don’t think so.


20 posted on 09/12/2007 8:31:43 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson