Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bubba Ho-Tep
I wrote: "Secession was not thought to be unconstitutional until the concept was challenged by the Lincoln administration."

After I posted I realized that what I meant to post was "Generally, secession was not thought to be unconstitutional until the concept was challenged by the Lincoln administration." My bad!

It was thought to be treasonous. "No man, no association of men, no state or set of states has a right to withdraw itself from this Union, of its own accord. "

One newspaper's opinion is still only one person's opinion, and we all know about opinions, ie - that everyone has one...... I believe that most folks held the opposite opinion.

743 posted on 09/04/2007 10:35:17 PM PDT by Rabble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 710 | View Replies ]


To: Rabble
I believe that most folks held the opposite opinion.

“Secession is nothing but revolution. The framers of our constitution never exhausted so much labor, wisdom, and forbearance in its formation, and surrounded it with so many guards and securities, if it was intended to be broken by every member of the Confederacy at will. It was intended for "perpetual union" so expressed in the preamble, and for the establishment of a government, not a compact, which can only be dissolved by revolution, or the consent of all the people in convention assembled. It is idle to talk of secession. Anarchy would have been established, and not a government, by Washington, Hamilton, Jefferson, Madison, and the other patriots of the Revolution. – Robert E. Lee, January 21, 1861

747 posted on 09/05/2007 9:28:03 AM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 743 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson