Rudy has a goal.
“Anyone claiming they’re the same is blind...that being said, it’s important to try to nominate a more conservative candidate than Giuliani in the primaries. He is not conservative enough for my tastes, but he is conservative enough to get my vote if he’s running against HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON. For crying out loud.”
We survived a Clinton presidency once, we can survive another - she is not the big buggaboo she is painted. Plus, the first Clinton presidency lead to the Republican Revolution of 1994 (which we blew of course). I’m not blind, my “vision” is 20/20. I WILL NOT accept a flawed candidate just because he is nominally a republican. To do so would be to sell out....I can understand pragmatism, but not a complete sellout. Plus, you conveinently ignore his anti 2nd ammendment views plus his blatant support of the legitimazation of Homosexuality.
Regardless of what he calls it (the current conflict), he has no business being the CinC of the Armed Forces that is mainly populated by southerners. He will be hated by the Joes. Clinton is already hated by most except for the whiners (yes sadly there are still many in uniform) that want to cut and run. The strong disdain the military has for her will force her to compromise. Guilani is arrogant and won’t.
Once again, I don’t see Guilani and any better than Clinton, and it may well be that Clinton might do better (heresy I know). Regardless, I won’t vote for either in a General Election. If the party wants my support they will ditch Rudi the Rumpranger.
Plus, you conveinently ignore his anti 2nd ammendment views plus his blatant support of the legitimazation of Homosexuality.
What is Hillary's stance on these two issues, especially vis a vis your following statement:
"...and it may well be that Clinton might do better..."
Rudy has a goal.