Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Badeye
The Union cavalry force was about 3 miles to the east. Stuart was attempting to flank the Union right, and if he had broken the Union cavalry (on the Union right flank), it would have fled westward and southward, and some of those fleeing would have most likely ended up crashing into the main Union line from its right flank, and behind.

Like I posited in my original post.

I said nothing about Union cavalry in front of the Union line. Why did you?

189 posted on 07/24/2007 7:16:54 PM PDT by an amused spectator (AGW: If you drag a hundred dollar bill through a research lab, you never know what you'll find)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]


To: an amused spectator

The Union cavalry force was about 3 miles to the east. Stuart was attempting to flank the Union right, and if he had broken the Union cavalry (on the Union right flank), it would have fled westward and southward, and some of those fleeing would have most likely ended up crashing into the main Union line from its right flank, and behind.
Like I posited in my original post.

I said nothing about Union cavalry in front of the Union line. Why did you?

Because of your references to the ‘charge’.

Bottom line is his horses were blown, and the results demonstrate it conclusively. Even if they had not, they’d have run into the Sixth Corps, and been rebuffed in any attempt like you are suggesting.

Cavalry v a Corps or more of Infantry gets its but kicked in that scenario.


195 posted on 07/25/2007 5:42:53 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson