Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Malaysia to receive brand-new Russian SU-30MKM fighters
Ria Novosti,Russia ^ | 18/ 07/ 2007 | Yury Zaitsev

Posted on 07/19/2007 7:00:39 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Malaysia to receive brand-new Russian fighters

13:09 | 18/ 07/ 2007

MOSCOW. (Yury Zaitsev for RIA Novosti) - Malaysia will receive the first 12 of its order of 18 Sukhoi Su-30-MKM Flanker fighters, the most advanced versions of the Su-27 warplane, before the year is out. The Su-30-MKM embodies the best achievements of the Russian aircraft industry and has the most advanced European avionics.

The Malaysian version is based on the Su-30-MKI, earmarked for India, but features different equipment and an electric remote control system.

Unlike the Indian version, the Su-30-MKM features a laser warning system and missile detectors. Two Russian-made active jamming systems are located inside wing-tip containers, and the fighter also has passive jamming systems featuring dipole reflectors and 98 decoys against heat-seeking missiles in the tail section.

The Malaysian version has more Russian-made components than the Su-30-MKI because Indian and Israeli systems have been removed from it. However, the Su-30-MKM features additional French-made systems.

Russia's Bars (Snow Leopard) phased-array radar can simultaneously track at least 15 aerial targets and directs fire against four of them at a time. Moreover, it can also effectively detect ground targets.

The Su-30-MKM features the same guided weapons as the Su-30-MKI.

Malaysia has become the second country to purchase these supersonic, super-agility fighters with vectored-thrust engines. The capabilities of this version may well exceed those of the Su-30 aircraft supplied to India.

Dato' Sri Aziran bin Ariffin, commander-in-chief of the Royal Malaysian Air Force, said the Su-30-MKM was now the best fourth-generation multi-role fighter in the world.

Yury Zaitsev is an academic adviser at the Russian Academy of Engineering Sciences.

The opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily represent those of RIA Novosti.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: aerospace; australia; india; malaysia; raaf; russia; su30; su30mki; sukhoi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Indian SU-30MKI

1 posted on 07/19/2007 7:00:41 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Like giving a 16 year-old a Ferrari


2 posted on 07/19/2007 7:02:37 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

It kinda reminds me of that jet in the movie Firefox w/Clint.


3 posted on 07/19/2007 7:04:40 AM PDT by DirtyPigpen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Cool.

Now, how many hours per month are Malaysian pilots going train with their lovely new toys?


4 posted on 07/19/2007 7:06:54 AM PDT by Little Ray (Rudy Guiliani: If his wives can't trust him, why should we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

I can’t find a picture from One Crazy Summer.


5 posted on 07/19/2007 7:07:37 AM PDT by wastedyears (Freedom is the right of all sentient beings - Peter Cullen as Optimus Prime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

And in other news,they want Super Hornets-

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1842852/posts


6 posted on 07/19/2007 7:13:47 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

If they have Sukhois, why do they want Hornets? Or vice-versa? Both fill the same roles.
They are just complicating their support structure.


7 posted on 07/19/2007 7:26:23 AM PDT by Little Ray (Rudy Guiliani: If his wives can't trust him, why should we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The Malaysian War Machine...
sounds threatening ... not.


8 posted on 07/19/2007 7:31:25 AM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Interestingly enough, when the deal was going down - the US had an opportunity but didn’t seem eager enough or willing to deal with those who actually were calling the shots. The Russians took the right approach and the Americans lost out.


9 posted on 07/19/2007 7:41:06 AM PDT by expatguy (Support - "An American Expat in Southeast Asia")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray
"Now, how many hours per month are Malaysian pilots going train with their lovely new toys?"

I give'em 1/2 hour per month.

10 posted on 07/19/2007 8:37:24 AM PDT by VaBthang4 ("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Really should make one wonder. What would they need those for? Some jungle huts need bombing?


11 posted on 07/19/2007 8:39:59 AM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
The Malaysian military is kind of like the Finish military in that they go after the best equipment on the market that is within their price range.

They have aircraft from the US, Russia, Britain, France, Spain, Switzerland, Italy, and Indonesia; ground-equipment from all corners of the world; but most of their naval assets are British, primarily because they have a long relationship of cooperation and support with the Brits, going back to WW2.

12 posted on 07/19/2007 8:49:43 AM PDT by Stonewall Jackson (The Hunt for FRed November. 11/04/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

“If they have Sukhois, why do they want Hornets? Or vice-versa? Both fill the same roles.
They are just complicating their support structure.”

I’d think so too.

Also, the article in post 6 refers to the F-18 as a fifth generation fighter which is just wrong.

I know the U.S. has much better service support, and it might be better to align with the U.S. for political reasons, but otherwise in a choice between the Su-30 and the F-18, the Su-30 should win. Then again, reliability of service support is important...

On the other hand, does the F-18 have more of a multirole capability than the Su-30?


13 posted on 07/20/2007 2:21:02 AM PDT by Constantine XI Palaeologus ("Vicisti, Galilaee")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Wow sounds like this one is better then the Indian version.


14 posted on 07/20/2007 5:45:52 AM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constantine XI Palaeologus

I think the F-18 has a better anti-shipping loadout if you shell out for the Harpoons. That is about it.


15 posted on 07/20/2007 5:56:01 AM PDT by Little Ray (Rudy Guiliani: If his wives can't trust him, why should we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
What RMAF doesn't have is the numbers but with Su-30 MKM, Mig-29s, F/A-18s Hornets, F-5 tigers and BAE Hawks they have a mighty airforce. I wonder how Singapore and Australia is going to react to that.

BTW RMAF Mig 29s were known to have beaten the crap out of the British RAF Tornados in friendly exercises. Their level of skill and training isnt all that bad.

16 posted on 07/20/2007 5:59:05 AM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constantine XI Palaeologus; Little Ray

The SuperHornet makes sense if you are talking about strike missions-the US has a more extensive & sophisticated array of PGMs that the Russians haven’t yet been able to match.It’s avionics are also a cut above...All this ofcourse,if Uncle Sam releases such systems for export to Malaysia.

The SU-30 could possibly carry upto 3 KH-31 and/or atleast 1 Yakhont/Brahmos supersonic anti-ship missiles.I’d take these over the Harpoon for most missions esp if I am an export customer.


17 posted on 07/20/2007 9:44:37 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan

We really don’t know the specs on the systems on either aircraft & both can be upgraded.The Malaysians any will need technical support & training from India for these jets!!


18 posted on 07/20/2007 9:45:52 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan

The Malaysians are going to face the same problems that the Indian airforce faced last decade.Too many aircraft with little commonality of systems & at a higher cost since they operate only around 20 of each of the major jets.OTOH,the RSAF had the sense to base their current fleet primarily on F-16s & F-15s,which share a considerable degree of commonality.


19 posted on 07/20/2007 9:49:00 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
I think that the RMAF still has problems with spares for their MiG-29's. So it would be interesting to see if the Su-30 support is better. Here are some pix that I shot of the RMAF Su-30 MKMs rehearsing for the country's 50th Independence Day celebrations.
Image Hosted by micronet-solutions.com

Malaysian Su-30 MKM

Posting HTML
Image Hosted by micronet-solutions.com

Malaysian Su-30 MKM

Posting HTML
Image Hosted by micronet-solutions.com

Malaysian Su-30 MKM

Posting HTML

20 posted on 08/28/2007 10:31:25 PM PDT by fleehb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson