Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Biodefense student; Shermy; jpl

Are you the Debra Anderson who contributed to Saxton’s campaign along with Ken Alibek?

http://www.newsmeat.com/campaign_contributions_to_politicians/donor_list.php?candidate_id=H4NJ13022&li=A

SAXTON, H. J (R)

Contributions for House of Reps
Campaigns: All Office: House of Reps
State: NJ
District: 3
Next Campaign: 2008

Alibek, Kenneth
Anderson, Debra


29 posted on 07/10/2007 9:03:53 AM PDT by TrebleRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: TrebleRebel; Shermy; jpl

To put the Saxton contribution in better perspective here’s another exerpt from the LA Times article:

Alibek’s most reliable benefactor in Washington has been Rep. H. James Saxton (R-N.J.), a gravelly voiced former elementary school teacher and state legislator. Saxton says that for two decades, he has focused on the threat posed by Islamic terrorism.

For most of the last decade, Saxton chaired the House Armed Services Committee’s terrorism subcommittee and also headed the Joint Economic Committee, where Forrest landed as a senior aide.

On May 21, 2002, Saxton called a news conference to announce “a potential new defense against bioterrorism,” based on Alibek’s tests with mice. After being treated with an experimental product, the mice had survived doses of smallpox and anthrax.

Saxton at the time said that the results held hope for “lifting some of the burden of fear that haunts Americans.”

And, while fighting for an earmark of federal grant money for Alibek at a March 2004 hearing, Saxton upbraided Anthony Tether, the Bush administration’s director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.

“You need to be more on his side,” Saxton said of Alibek, adding: “I find it hard to believe that I have to fight as hard as I can to get a few measly bucks to keep him going.”


30 posted on 07/10/2007 9:16:20 AM PDT by TrebleRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: TrebleRebel; Biodefense student

TrebleRebel,

Did you expect Osama perchance to be contributing instead?

It’s called the American campaign of election finance.

There was absolutely nothing inappropriate about Ken being a donor in fact it would be highly perplexing if he weren’t.

So the post was moderately rude.

You are hereby duly cautioned. I didn’t bring Debra to the party but I aim to make sure that no internet posting hooligans pass gas while she’s here at the dance. It’s a rare opportunity to learn something from someone with actual knowledge of the facts under discussion. Now if only you had the good manners of Shermy or Mitchell.

Why don’t you put the education your momma paid for to good use and explain to me why the patents I’ve referenced do not explain the AFIP’s detection of silica.


32 posted on 07/10/2007 10:12:17 AM PDT by ZacandPook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: TrebleRebel; jpl; ZacandPook
TR - Lots of different Debra Andersons out there and this one was somebody else. My charitable donations go to supporting 4 children a month through CCF (Charity, Zachary, Supat, and Juan Carlos). That’s the extent of my generous spirit (financially)

Regarding the accident at Sverdlovsk - Dr. Alibek wasn't involved in that. Sverdlovsk was and still is a military facility. Dr. Alibek worked at civilian facilities only. It says in that same article you quote that he was just beginning his career at Biopreparat. Dr. Alibek worked at the Siberian branch of the Institute of Applied Biochemistry near Berdsk from 1976 to 1979 then transferred to the Eastern European scientific branch of the Institute of Applied Biochemistry near Omutninsk. After Omutninsk, he went to Stepnogorsk and then on to Moscow. He knows about the accident because of interactions with people from Sverdlovsk, not because he worked there. As far as the "improvements" to the Sverdlovsk anthrax formulation, the information you have listed is not correct. He did reduce the amount of formulation required as compared to the Sverdlovsk formulation but the way it was done has nothing to do with what you describe as far as plastic and resin. Enhancing "flyability" was something else he did but it isn't related to decreasing the amount of formulation required. As far as coating the spores in resin, that is incorrect too. Though for obvious common sense reasons I won't elaborate further, I'll just point out that coating spores in resin would increase their particle size and mass, decreasing their ability to "float". Sorry, don't know where you received your information but sadly much of what I have seen printed is incorrect. It is really frustrating to be somewhere, hear what he actually says, and then see how incorrect what actually gets printed is from what he said. jpl - thanks so much for that. I couldn’t agree with you more about the naivety within the university system as regards to foreign governments using our educational institutions to train their people. Iraq was especially guilty of this. One of our students actually wrote her dissertation about such vulnerability but during the defense, 2 of her committee members resigned from her committee allegedly due to fear of repercussions from the university administration. Regarding Dr. Alibek, it is natural that you don’t trust him because, as you volunteered, you don’t know him. Zacandpook - thanks for jumping in. All - I am having problems with my email address and will post a new one once they are resolved. Debra

36 posted on 07/10/2007 1:38:11 PM PDT by Biodefense student
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson