I concede that you can take almost any article that mentions al Qaeda and twist and distort it to somehow create what you believe is "proof" for your beliefs. But that doesn't mean you are right. It more likely means you are nuts.
Ed,
Let me simplify things for you.
There are two squads on the Amerithrax Task Force.
One has always pursued an Al Qaeda theory.
One has pursued a non-Al Qaeda theory.
You don’t bother reading articles bearing on the analysis and the hundreds of thousands of manhours spent by well over a dozen Amerithrax agents.
That immediately disqualifies your true crime analysis from being taken seriously.
You have cognitive rigidity — and have locked on the suggestion someone in a newsgroup made in December 2001 that a First Grader wrote the letters.
Then when others seek to do the reasoning being done by the Amerithrax investigators, based on the public record, you resort to insults.
You should try fewer insults and assess the evidence the Amerithrax Task Force has studied now for over a half decade.
The reason you don’t address the merits is because you don’t understand them.