What you posted there sounds too constructed and paranoid to be taken seriously by anyone not totally dim.
I don't mind about what things sound. I mind about what things are. I gave you evidence, facts. You have more here:
Here they are
Or here:
Spain’s “Terrorgate”? by Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.
There is even more that I haven't translated yet.
If Jose is in fact your real name, you are propably a convert. I’m 80% sure your are a mohammedan. Your smearing of Catholics in this post just completes the picture.
I don't understand what you are saying. If Jamal Ahmidan, the leader of the alleged cell that blew up in Leganés sent his son to study to a Catholic school, that is a fact. If he was celebrating the Catholic father's day on March 19th (in the Protestant world I think is other date), that is a fact. If a chromatogram shows the presence of nitro glycerine, a component of ETA dynamite, that is a fact. If the European media, but a Dutch news channel, hide those facts about 3/11, that is a sign that they have earned something with it.
Those are the facts. I like the Anglosphere because people here know the difference between facts and opinions.
The conservative candidate of Aznar’s party lost because the vast majority of the Spaniards was simply against any involvement of their country in Iraq.
The reaction on the bombing was only a confirmation of the already existing denial. It never pays out for politicians in countries with democratic elections to ignore the will of their voters. BTW - this is the reason why Merkel i.e. is extremely reluctant concerning Iraq. If she would do something substancial for America there, her gouvernment would be blown into pieces since the German public does not want the German gouvernment to be involved into this issue.
Same thing in Spain. The bombing was simply the trigger that released a wave of a broad disaffection with Aznar because of Iraq. ETA or al Quaida? That was irrelevant.