‘’
Voted where? What are you referring to here? What vote’’
I suggest you broaden your horizon and have a luck at some polls that have been done in many European countries at that time. AFAIK most people(between 50 and 80 percent) disapproved the war. Just calling a spate a spate..
‘’
appeasing sympathizers, people, just like you, that believe the continued appeasement of murderous dictators is a path of great wisdom. The message board is called the democratic underground. Perhaps you ...’’
Blablaba..
More simplistic BS.
Ouch!
Luck = look.
“I suggest you broaden your horizon and have a luck at some polls that have been done in many European countries at that time.”
Why would you think a conservative such as myself would believe that European opinion polls should dictate U.S. foreign policy? Adopting such a mind set would ‘broaden my horizon’? How?
“Blablaba..
More simplistic BS”
On the contrary. It’s simple really. Saddam signed a cease fire agreement with us that ended the first gulf war. He refused to abide by the terms of this cease fire. By allowing him to continually and blatently violate said terms, this constituted continued appeasement of this murderous dictator. Do you contest this? (I’m hoping you will reply with substance, but you have yet to offer anything more than silly one liners that have no substance). Removing the government of Saddam was prefered over continued appeasement. What would your solution be, other than the continued appeasement of Saddam? (I’m guessing you won’t answer this with any substance either). You labled my last reply ‘BS’. What statements have I made that you consider infactual. (I’m hoping a response of substance rather than your snide one-liners that have no substance what-so-ever).