Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge suspends Nifong, proceeds with request to remove him
WLOS ^ | 06/19/2007 | AP

Posted on 06/19/2007 9:35:57 AM PDT by Sleeping Freeper

DURHAM, N.C. (AP) -- A judge suspended District Attorney Mike Nifong today after learning the prosecutor disbarred for his handling of the Duke lacrosse rape case intended to stay in office for another month.

Superior Court Judge Orlando Hudson wrote in his order that Nifong's actions has brought his office into disrepute.

State lawmakers are scheduled to take up a bill later today that would allow Governor Easley to immediately remove Nifong from office.

Nifong said in a letter released yesterday that he would leave office on July 13th.

His legal assistant, Candy Clark, says Nifong wasn't in the office today. The one case he was currently handling was being reassigned.

Sheriff Worth Hill says he went to Nifong's house and took the keys and badge that gave him access to his office.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: dukelax; nifong
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: middie
Yes, I am sorry to say I believe he is judgment-proof. That must have been something he weighed before he jumped into the fray. I hear home and all assets were in wife’s name on the off-chance he “figured” wrong. He just had to make it long enough and it didn’t matter who he had to take down to get there.

If he had run an honest election, Freda would have beaten him and he would have been out. This was a calculated (very calculated) risk and he’s going to make it by the skin of his teeth.

21 posted on 06/19/2007 10:23:59 AM PDT by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG
He will become a wealthy man

You mean the LAX 3 will become wealthier men. Nifong wont be keeping any of his ill begotten booty.

22 posted on 06/19/2007 10:27:45 AM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy
No, pensions can’t be attached.

Pensions cannot be attached in the hands of the payor. But once the funds are transferred to the payee (Nifong) or his bank, they are fair game and can be attached. This, of course, strings out the process.

23 posted on 06/19/2007 10:29:39 AM PDT by surely_you_jest (I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts. - Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Freeper

ping for later


24 posted on 06/19/2007 10:32:27 AM PDT by Jibaholic (http://www.gentlerespect.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: middie
A crime is an offense that’s either statutory or prohibited under common law and recognized. Nifong’s conduct, as reprehensible as it was, is not a crime.

Really? Not a crime, you say? How about obstruction of justice? Seems to me that he delayed the delivery of justice to the accused by suppressing evidence that would've exonerated them.
25 posted on 06/19/2007 10:38:43 AM PDT by JamesP81 (Romans 10:9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG
He will become a wealthy man, more so than if he had kept his job.

With OJ's little scam fresh in mind, it's unlikely that Nifong will keep one penny, and he'll also lose the copyright to his own book.

26 posted on 06/19/2007 10:42:39 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Freeper

I have to wonder how many others are railroaded by the justice system and never vindicated. These boys are lucky their case was high profile (allowed them to get good lawyers), though admittedly that’s part of the reason Nifong went after them so hard in the first place.


27 posted on 06/19/2007 10:45:26 AM PDT by DemEater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG
Nifong has started writing his memoirs of the Duke case

Buy Coach Pressler's book, It's Not About the Truth, instead. Give the money to someone who was hurt by Nifong.

28 posted on 06/19/2007 10:46:30 AM PDT by trimom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: angkor

Anybody know anything about plans to prosecute the stripper who brought the false charges?


29 posted on 06/19/2007 10:47:22 AM PDT by twonie (Keep your guns - and stockpile ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: CaptRon

The judge could remove, I believe, because he has been disbarred. Most DAs have to be practicing attornies.


30 posted on 06/19/2007 10:49:57 AM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: middie
but there is no crime in the facts I’ve seen and I’ve followed this closely from a professional interest

Are you really saying that it is not a crime to frame an innocent man for a crime he did not commit?

31 posted on 06/19/2007 11:14:55 AM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: middie

One of the charges the panel said he was guilty of was to use deceit and fraud in his prosecution. That isn’t a crime???


32 posted on 06/19/2007 11:39:20 AM PDT by mware (By all that you hold dear..on this good earth... I bid you stand! Men of the West!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mware

There can be no crime unless and until there is a charge, either and indictment of a prosecutorial information (a discretionary charge), followed by a trial or plea to a crime and the adjudication of guilt and the affirmation of such by an appellate court. That’s is how our criminal justice system, and that of all civilized western, common law countries operates. Sure there’s evidence that a prosecutor could assemble to make out a criminal offense. But unless and unless that’s done there’s-no-there,-there.


33 posted on 06/19/2007 11:46:18 AM PDT by middie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: DemEater

Hey, I thought lawyers are unremittingly hated by everyone but me and Clarity on FR. Now there seems to an ironic phrase here for some of us.


34 posted on 06/19/2007 11:49:22 AM PDT by middie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: surely_you_jest

Nope. The proceeds of a fund of money that is immune from attachment at the initial point along its line of receipt is free from attachment at all points. Eg: the proceeds from the sale of a home that was homestead does not lose its protected status of being free from execution in those states, like Florida, where a person’ homestead is immune. The fund of money merely substitutes for the property.


35 posted on 06/19/2007 11:53:04 AM PDT by middie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: middie

Until such time as the funds are commingled, which would involve both quesions of fact and law. In any event, at this point the judgment debtor would have both the burden of going forward as well as the burden of persuasion.


36 posted on 06/19/2007 12:18:09 PM PDT by surely_you_jest (I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts. - Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: surely_you_jest

So long as the immune amount is definitive or, in legal terms, liquidated, its protected characteristic remains even though, money being fungible, it is intermixed with non-immune funds. Again, the homestead amount in cash rather than property. The protected fund can even be dissipated and be treated as an immune credit if new cash replaces it.


37 posted on 06/19/2007 1:18:14 PM PDT by middie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: RacerF150

The governor exacted a promise from him for the interim appointment that he wouldn’t run in the general election. He deceived the governor who could nothing about it. Revenge is much sweeter cold....Now the governor can take solace in the self-governing bar cleaning its own house and the judicial system crushing the lout and tyrant.


38 posted on 06/19/2007 1:22:56 PM PDT by middie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: middie
The governor exacted a promise from him for the interim appointment that he wouldn’t run in the general election. He deceived the governor who could nothing about it. Revenge is much sweeter cold....Now the governor can take solace in the self-governing bar cleaning its own house and the judicial system crushing the lout and tyrant.

Nifong was his hand-picked boy. Easley is still a Democrat scumbag leading the most corrupt state in the SE.

39 posted on 06/19/2007 2:38:27 PM PDT by Niteranger68 (Amnesty….NO MEANS NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson