Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/01/2007 4:09:11 PM PDT by mittreport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: mittreport

Facebook being free, I don’t see the problem.


2 posted on 05/01/2007 4:11:57 PM PDT by oakcon (America wants you: Run Fred Run!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mittreport

Maybe he was getting too many offers from Mormon women to be another wife for him.


3 posted on 05/01/2007 4:13:58 PM PDT by needlenose_neely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mittreport
Thoughts?

The McShame-Slimeroad Lieberal Protection Act has unintended consequences (which will, of course, be ignored by the DhimmiRATs).

4 posted on 05/01/2007 4:14:41 PM PDT by steveegg (I am John Doe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mittreport
WOW!!! This IS Breaking News!
5 posted on 05/01/2007 4:15:23 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mittreport

Why would anyone care?


7 posted on 05/01/2007 4:17:02 PM PDT by Beagle8U (FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super Walmart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mittreport

Disclosure requirements? Hmmm... I guess I’d have to see more about the fine lines they’re combing through on this one.

I will say that I got my Romanian friend curious about Romney when she saw him on my myspace friend list. She loved his speeches. Not that it’s going to convert into votes for him. :)


10 posted on 05/01/2007 4:22:26 PM PDT by CheyennePress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mittreport
There has also been questions whether presidential candidates using Facebook violates any of the campaign finance act disclosure requirements.

Free Speech is alive and well somewhere on this planet.

11 posted on 05/01/2007 4:36:42 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mittreport
UPDATE: Word is that it was a Facebook technical glitch.

Still it raises an interesting questions about new media and current campaign laws. Youtube, Facebook, and blogs like this all provide a greater flow of information. I just wonder how long until politicians try to muzzle this new median of speech.

I am curious can a interest group or corporation post commercials, etc., on youtube and blogs with in the 60 and 30 day moratorium that applies to television? From what I understand is the FEC is not going to regulate these new media venues. If that is the case then what is the point of prohibiting them interest groups from using TV as well?

What if another Obama 1984 type ad hits, can news programs show the complete ads on TV within the 60 and 30 blackout?

-MR

14 posted on 05/01/2007 7:02:20 PM PDT by mittreport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mittreport

huh? one of my kids told me he has a myspace account...has that also been dumped?


16 posted on 05/01/2007 7:51:31 PM PDT by Katya (Homo Nosce Te Ipsum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson