To: thehumanlynx
What's interesting is he made the claim of showing his
superior morals by refusing to make personal attacks. Ha!
And since I don't buy the theory of evolution, one of his attempts at changing the subject, he questions my judgment—a personal attack. He's not interested in learning anything because he already knows everything, or so he appears to write.
Pot.
Kettle.
Black.
Indeed.
148 posted on
02/27/2007 12:20:56 PM PST by
scripter
(Duncan Hunter in 2008)
To: scripter
And since I don't buy the theory of evolution, one of his attempts at changing the subject, he questions my judgmenta personal attack.
No, because your judgement is something that is relevant to the discussion. If you make outrageous claims about one subject, it's quite likely that you would make them about another subject.
He's not interested in learning anything because he already knows everything, or so he appears to write.
In fact, I've been the one most careful not to accept anything unless there is factual evidence for it. You, on the other hand, claim to be an expert. I point out that it's not that simple, and that you don't really know what you're talking about.
By the way, you need to ping people when you're talking about them. But we already know you think that talking about people behind their backs is moral, dont you?
152 posted on
02/27/2007 2:53:42 PM PST by
LtdGovt
("Where government moves in, community retreats and civil society disintegrates" -Janice Rogers Brown)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson