Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LETTER FROM THE DNC
DNC

Posted on 02/16/2007 5:46:53 AM PST by Tokra

I was emailed a letter from the DNC. Here are the contents:

According to House Minority Leader John Boehner, I'm a "terrorist sympathizer," and you probably are too.

Just days ago on the floor of the House of Representatives, the Republican leader claimed that "al Qaeda and terrorist sympathizers around the world are trying to divide us here at home. Over the next few days, we have an opportunity to show our enemies that we will not take the bait."

This isn't the first time Republicans have linked Democrats with terrorists at the time of an important vote. In fact, it's become the norm.

In October 2004, then-Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert claimed that al Qaeda "would like to influence this election" and would be more comfortable if John Kerry were elected.

This past August, Vice President Cheney claimed that anti-war voters in Connecticut were encouraging "al Qaeda types" to "break the will of the American people in terms of our ability to stay the fight and complete the task."

And just days before our landslide victory in the November midterm elections, President Bush claimed that "the Democrat[ic] approach in Iraq comes down to this: The terrorists win and America loses."

Put a stop to the slander. Help the Democrats pass the House Iraq resolution, and help wavering Republicans stand up to this rhetoric:

http://www.democrats.org/noescalation

The "bait" that Boehner refers to is the House Democrats' war resolution that Governor Dean emailed you about on Tuesday -- a vote of no-confidence in the president's plan to escalate the war in Iraq.

You see, with 70% of the public opposing escalation and potentially 60 Republicans crossing party lines, the Republican leadership is resorting to desperate measures to try to fool the American people and stop this damning vote.

Support the Iraq resolution -- and tell Boehner that we aren't buying his publicity stunts:

The Republicans know the mess they're in. In a desperate letter to their Republican colleagues, Congressmembers John Shadegg and Peter Hoekstra wrote:

"The debate should not be about the surge or its details. This debate should not even be about the Iraq war to date, mistakes that have been made, or whether we can, or cannot, win militarily. If we let Democrats force us into a debate on the surge or the current situation in Iraq, we lose."

Why are Republicans scared of a debate on America's top issue? And why can't they stand up to the Democrats on the current situation in Iraq?

Because it wasn't the Democratic Party that led us into a war on false pretenses. Democrats didn't alienate our global allies by ignoring diplomatic efforts to find a peaceful resolution. Democrats didn't reject the advice of our military leaders, who recommended we change the course. And Democrats didn't decide to put more of our troops in harm/s way to interfere in a bloody civil war with no end in sight.



TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
I sent them back an email and told them "If the shoe fits....."

I told they need to listen closely to what the terrorists are saying because you can't tell if the words come from the terrorists or from the democrats because they say exactly the same thing.

The lies in this email are just unbelievable!

Why on earth they picked ME to send this to is a mystery. But it is an eye-opener to see just how delusional these people are.

1 posted on 02/16/2007 5:46:54 AM PST by Tokra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tokra

Democrats love debates (and talking about fear of debates) but when it comes to action, well........

I hear there will be a section reserved for CAIR at the DNC convention.


2 posted on 02/16/2007 5:48:42 AM PST by relictele
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tokra
The left thinks all they have to do is say they're not sympathizers and that makes it so irregardless of their actions.
3 posted on 02/16/2007 5:49:13 AM PST by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tokra

4 posted on 02/16/2007 5:50:33 AM PST by hippy hate me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tokra

They truly are delusional.

They do not see that their actions are undermining the security of our troops and our nation.

It is a political stragedy gone awry. When Ted Kennedy announced the candidacy of his protege, John Kerry, he announced that the war was "Bush's War" and would be "Bush's Vietnam". Kerry, an anti-war Vietnam veteran, needed such a platform to succeed.

Once the mainstream Democrats began this path, which was only held previously by extreme nutcases and socialists (same thing?), it swelled with media support beyond control.

Of course people oppose the war, who could support a war that is being criticized by half of the political leadership in the country?!??


5 posted on 02/16/2007 5:53:18 AM PST by Paloma_55 (I may be a hateful bigot, but I still love you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tokra
For the sake of argument, let's assume that the Democrats are NOT terrorist sympathizers.

If they WERE terrorist sympathizers, how would their actions be different?

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)

LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

6 posted on 02/16/2007 5:54:04 AM PST by LonePalm (Commander and Chef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tokra

To a degree all politics is propaganda, but the Democrats have taken lying and manipulating and demagougeing to an unprecedented level. Every time they ask for a vote or for money is because there is either a crisis (health care, education, environment), a great injustice (taxes, new prisons, not enought rights for somebody, etc.) or the end of the world and democracy(Goldwater, Reagan, Bush II, Vietnam, Iraq, Patriot Act, Guantanamo, etc.

At least Republicans TRY to sound like rational humans, the only problem with the Republican "propaganda" is you know they're going to come up short with the problems they tell you about and want you to help fix with your money.


7 posted on 02/16/2007 5:58:45 AM PST by word_warrior_bob (You can now see my amazing doggie and new puppy on my homepage!! Come say hello to Jake & Sonny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tokra
I sent them back an email and told them "If the shoe fits....."

That was my first thought too!

8 posted on 02/16/2007 6:05:45 AM PST by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help m)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tokra
I'm a "terrorist sympathizer," and you probably are too.

I'm convinced. Case closed.
9 posted on 02/16/2007 6:12:42 AM PST by AaronInCarolina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paloma_55
They do not see that their actions are undermining the security of our troops and our nation.

I honestly believe they do and do not care, because it is Power at any cost to the democraps.

10 posted on 02/16/2007 6:13:27 AM PST by WesternPacific
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Paloma_55

Once the mainstream Democrats began this path, which was only held previously by extreme nutcases and socialists (same thing?), it swelled with media support beyond control.

Of course people oppose the war, who could support a war that is being criticized by half of the political leadership in the country?!??

__________

This is what Democrats and The Media have been waiting for for a long time, A war big enough to call "Vietnam". The left and the media see stopping the Vietanam war as their greatest and most triumphant political "victory" ever, as twisted as that is. Dividing the nation and stopping a war against the escalation of Communism is your proudest moment?

"We stopped a war man, we stopped a war, pass that joint"

Bush and The War In Iraq is the Daily Double they've hoped and prayed for a long time. A President they can vilify AND a war they can oppose and call "unjust".

A chance to unleash their poorly hidden hatred of this country while calling themselves "patriots", a chance to "loathe the military" while "supporting the troops".

Happy Days Are Here Again If You're a True Left Winger.


11 posted on 02/16/2007 6:14:19 AM PST by word_warrior_bob (You can now see my amazing doggie and new puppy on my homepage!! Come say hello to Jake & Sonny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tokra
>>>This isn't the first time Republicans have linked Democrats with terrorists at the time of an important vote. In fact, it's become the norm.

Important Vote? Nah, ALWAYS!

In the spring of 1992, he wrote a story about Clinton's conscience - wrestling about the draft while at Oxford. Theses stories by Talbott were big lies. Clinton rewarded Talbott by making him the number two person at the State Department. Sidney Blumenthal - The top White House spin master is a long time friend of the Clintons. Blumenthal is a former member of Students for a Democratic Society (SDS).

Look here, from From “Mutiny Does Not Happen Lightly: The Literature of the American Resistance to the Vietnam War”

The game of the rich has caught up to Pig America. The Vietnamese have kicked ass out of U.S. occupational troops. More and more G.I.’s will no longer listen to Pig Nixon’s orders and are turning their guns around on the real enemy. The Provisional Revolutionary Government in Vietnam (Viet Cong) has led the Vietnamese people to complete victory.

–Roxboro School SDS- Cleveland Heights – June 4, 1972

Recently many articles have appeared in the movement press expounding the virtues of deserting and going AWOL. “Come to Canada and be a man.” “Soldiers are pigs,” “To remain in the imperialist U.S. Army rather than leaving is comparable to being a Nazi.” Last year there were, by Pentagon counts,, 250,000 AWOL’s and over 53,000 deserters. This has not made much of a dent in the fighting strength of the U.S.Army. That dent has clearly come from the heroic struggle of the Vietnamese people under the leadership of the NLF and the Provisional Revolutionary Government.

–New York Regional SDS distributed at Boston University - Feb. 22, 1969

Students for a Democratic Society = SDS
-----------------------------------------------------------
Youth Against War and Fascism was on Ho Chi Minh's Pen Pal list. Now THIS gets interesting!

My Dear -------

I have received your letter. You and the progressive American people, especially the youth, feel indignant at the barbarous crimes perpetrated in Vietnam by the U.S. imperialists who have thus besmeared the honor of the American people and the noble traditions of the United States. I am glad to learn that you and many other young Americans are actively endeavoring under varied forms to help push forward the movement against the war of aggression in Vietnam and in support of the Vietnamese people.

With affectionate greetings,

Signed, Uncle Ho

June 18, Nov. 25, 1965



On February 7, 1965, the U.S. began its systematic air massacre of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (North Vietnam). The U.S. also plans to bomb the system of dikes in the Democratic Republic of Vietnam which helps the North Vietnamese from drowning and starving. Just as the U.S. is attempting to drown in blood the liberation struggle of the South Vietnamese people because it is the model for liberation struggles everywhere, so North Vietnam is being bombed to bits because it shows all colonial and former colonial countries, by living example, that Socialism can solve their problems.

–Youth Against War and Fascism, Free University of New York - Aug. 27, 1966



As far as the Vietnamese are concerned, we are fighting on the side of Hitlerism, and they hope we lose. You are supposed to be fighting to “save the Vietnamese people from Communism.” Certainly Communist influence is very strong in the National Liberation Front, the rebel government. Yet most of the people support the NLF. Why ? The war in Vietnam is not being fought according to the rules. Prisoners are tortured. Our planes drop incendiaary bombs on civilian villages. Our soldiers shoot at women and children. Your officers will tell you that it is all necessary, that we couldn’t win the war any other way. We believe that the atrocities which are necessary to win this war against the people of Vietnam are inexcusable.

–Vietnam Day Committee, San Franscisco - Aug. 2, 1966.
---------------------------------------------------------
Major leaders of the anti-war movement:


· Al Hubbard - Vietnam Veterans Against the War - signed the People’s Peace Treaty of 1971

· Jane Fonda - actress - signed the People’s Peace Treaty of 1971

See post http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1209454/posts?page=59#59 for People's Peace Treaty

· Noam Chomsky, MIT

· Rev. William Sloan Coffin, Jr. Yale

· Rennie Davis, May Day Collective

· Rev. Daniel Berrigan,S.J.

· Dave Dellinger, People’s Coalition for Peace and Justice

· Daniel Ellsberg - MIT

· Richard Falk - Princeton

· Tom Hayden - Berkeley

· Abbie Hoffman - WPAX, NewYork

· Sidney Peck - People’s Coalition for Peace and justice

· Bobby Seale- Black Panther Party

· Benjamin Spock, doctor

· Gloria Steinem - author

· George Wald, biologist, Havard

· Cora Weiss - Women Strike for Peace


Many of the people who signed the various documents in “Mutiny Does Not Happen Lightly: The Literature of the American Resistance to the Vietnam War” appeared again as signers of the “Not In Our Name” ad that appeared in papers all over the country, denouncing Bush and the wars on terrorism and Iraq.


-------------------------------------------------------
Much more collected on this thread: Vets refuse to forgive Kerry for antiwar acts , including Clinton's ROTC Letter that was Entered in Congressional Record

12 posted on 02/16/2007 6:15:00 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tokra
Great response.

I suppose there's no point in pointing out that the RATs are vulnerable to charges of being America bashing, terrorist coddling Marxists...due to their 40 year track record of same.

It's theoretically possible, I suppose, to "oppose the war" but "support the troops." It would take people more principled and thoughtful than RATs will ever be.

13 posted on 02/16/2007 6:15:02 AM PST by gogeo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LonePalm
Democraps/Socialist see it as the final results will justify the means. For the betterment of all, "And you know what I mean!
14 posted on 02/16/2007 6:17:26 AM PST by WesternPacific
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hippy hate me

15 posted on 02/16/2007 6:19:32 AM PST by radar101 (LIBERALS = Hypocrisy and Fantasy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson