Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North Korea - Denuclearization Action Plan
The U.S. State Department ^ | February 13, 2007 | The U.S. State Department

Posted on 02/14/2007 12:30:35 AM PST by snowsislander

Skip Links
U.S. Department of State
North Korea Agrees to Nuclear Disarmament  |  Daily Press Briefing | What's New U.S. Department of State
U.S. Department of State
SEARCH U.S. Department of State
Subject Index
U.S. Department of State
Links to Scrolling Headlines
Home Issues & Press Travel & Business Countries Youth & Education Careers About State
Video
Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs > Bureau of Public Affairs > Press Relations Office > Press Releases (Other) > 2007 > February 

Media Note
Office of the Spokesman
Washington, DC
February 13, 2007


North Korea - Denuclearization Action Plan


Statement by President Bush on Six Party Talks

The following action plan was released in Beijing on February 13, 2007 following the conclusion of the latest round of Six-Party Talks.

Initial Actions for the Implementation of the Joint Statement

13 February 2007

The Third Session of the Fifth Round of the Six-Party Talks was held in Beijing among the People's Republic of China, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Russian Federation and the United States of America from 8 to 13 February 2007.

Mr. Wu Dawei, Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs of the PRC, Mr. Kim Gye Gwan, Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs of the DPRK; Mr. Kenichiro Sasae, Director-General for Asian and Oceanian Affairs, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan; Mr. Chun Yung-woo, Special Representative for Korean Peninsula Peace and Security Affairs of the ROK Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade; Mr. Alexander Losyukov, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation; and Mr. Christopher Hill, Assistant Secretary for East Asian and Pacific Affairs of the Department of State of the United States attended the talks as heads of their respective delegations.

Vice Foreign Minister Wu Dawei chaired the talks.

I. The Parties held serious and productive discussions on the actions each party will take in the initial phase for the implementation of the Joint Statement of 19 September 2005. The Parties reaffirmed their common goal and will to achieve early denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula in a peaceful manner and reiterated that they would earnestly fulfill their commitments in the Joint Statement. The Parties agreed to take coordinated steps to implement the Joint Statement in a phased manner in line with the principle of "action for action".

II. The Parties agreed to take the following actions in parallel in the initial phase:

  1. The DPRK will shut down and seal for the purpose of eventual abandonment the Yongbyon nuclear facility, including the reprocessing facility and invite back IAEA personnel to conduct all necessary monitoring and verifications as agreed between IAEA and the DPRK.
  2. The DPRK will discuss with other parties a list of all its nuclear programs as described in the Joint Statement, including plutonium extracted from used fuel rods, that would be abandoned pursuant to the Joint Statement.
  3. The DPRK and the US will start bilateral talks aimed at resolving pending bilateral issues and moving toward full diplomatic relations. The US will begin the process of removing the designation of the DPRK as a state-sponsor of terrorism and advance the process of terminating the application of the Trading with the Enemy Act with respect to the DPRK.
  4. The DPRK and Japan will start bilateral talks aimed at taking steps to normalize their relations in accordance with the Pyongyang Declaration, on the basis of the settlement of unfortunate past and the outstanding issues of concern.
  5. Recalling Section 1 and 3 of the Joint Statement of 19 September 2005, the Parties agreed to cooperate in economic, energy and humanitarian assistance to the DPRK. In this regard, the Parties agreed to the provision of emergency energy assistance to the DPRK in the initial phase. The initial shipment of emergency energy assistance equivalent to 50,000 tons of heavy fuel oil (HFO) will commence within next 60 days.

The Parties agreed that the above-mentioned initial actions will be implemented within next 60 days and that they will take coordinated steps toward this goal.

III. The Parties agreed on the establishment of the following Working Groups (WG) in order to carry out the initial actions and for the purpose of full implementation of the Joint Statement:

  1. Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula
  2. Normalization of DPRK-US relations
  3. Normalization of DPRK-Japan relations
  4. Economy and Energy Cooperation
  5. Northeast Asia Peace and Security Mechanism

The WGs will discuss and formulate specific plans for the implementation of the Joint Statement in their respective areas. The WGs shall report to the Six-Party Heads of Delegation Meeting on the progress of their work. In principle, progress in one WG shall not affect progress in other WGs. Plans made by the five WGs will be implemented as a whole in a coordinated manner.

The Parties agreed that all WGs will meet within next 30 days.

IV. During the period of the Initial Actions phase and the next phase - which includes provision by the DPRK of a complete declaration of all nuclear programs and disablement of all existing nuclear facilities, including graphite-moderated reactors and reprocessing plant - economic, energy and humanitarian assistance up to the equivalent of 1 million tons of heavy fuel oil (HFO), including the initial shipment equivalent to 50,000 tons of HFO, will be provided to the DPRK.

The detailed modalities of the said assistance will be determined through consultations and appropriate assessments in the Working Group on Economic and Energy Cooperation.

V. Once the initial actions are implemented, the Six Parties will promptly hold a ministerial meeting to confirm implementation of the Joint Statement and explore ways and means for promoting security cooperation in Northeast Asia.

VI. The Parties reaffirmed that they will take positive steps to increase mutual trust, and will make joint efforts for lasting peace and stability in Northeast Asia. The directly related parties will negotiate a permanent peace regime on the Korean Peninsula at an appropriate separate forum.

VII. The Parties agreed to hold the Sixth Round of the Six-Party Talks on 19 March 2007 to hear reports of WGs and discuss on actions for the next phase.

2007/099

U.S. Department of State
USA.gov U.S. Department of State Updates  |  Frequent Questions  |  Contact Us  |  Email this Page  |  Subject Index  |  Search
The Office of Electronic Information, Bureau of Public Affairs, manages this site as a portal for information from the U.S. State Department. External links to other Internet sites should not be construed as an endorsement of the views or privacy policies contained therein.
FOIA  |  Privacy Notice  |  Copyright Information  |  Other U.S. Government Information


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: kimjongil; korea; northkorea
My opinion is that this is "Agreed Framework, version 2.0."

Most disappointing to me are the two points (1) The US will begin the process of removing the designation of the DPRK as a state-sponsor of terrorism and advance the process of terminating the application of the Trading with the Enemy Act with respect to the DPRK and (2) ...economic, energy and humanitarian assistance up to the equivalent of 1 million tons of heavy fuel oil (HFO), including the initial shipment equivalent to 50,000 tons of HFO, will be provided to the DPRK.

1 posted on 02/14/2007 12:30:37 AM PST by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: snowsislander

Bottom line, I don't trust the DPRK one bit. Any deal made with them is a deal they will break. Any concession made to them is a gain for them and a loss for the rest of the world. At least they've shown us as much in the past. As soon as the rest of the world agrees to any of their demands, they just come back with new ones.


2 posted on 02/14/2007 3:03:05 AM PST by SwedishConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander

give in to any demands by N.Korea is just plain stupid.
They will not honor any treaty. They have shown numerous times in the past they are not to be trusted.
Fools we are.


3 posted on 02/14/2007 3:56:23 AM PST by Joe Boucher (an enemy of islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander
energy and humanitarian assistance up to the equivalent of 1 million tons of heavy fuel oil (HFO),

How much is 1 million tons of oil worth on the open market?

4 posted on 02/14/2007 4:32:34 AM PST by Tai_Chung
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander

Any bets on how long until NK cheats?


5 posted on 02/14/2007 5:31:15 AM PST by CPOSharky (Year = 365 days. muzzy 'most holy' days = 450. Go figure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CPOSharky
Any bets on how long until NK cheats?

My best guess is the ink on this farcical document won't be dry before they cheat, since I don't believe that Kim Jong-il will ever carry out the provisos in part IV: During the period of the Initial Actions phase and the next phase - which includes provision by the DPRK of a complete declaration of all nuclear programs and disablement of all existing nuclear facilities, including graphite-moderated reactors and reprocessing plant...

The North Koreans have always lied about their nuclear programs, and I don't believe that they will suddenly begin telling the truth now. They have hidden their nuclear efforts, and I believe that they will continue to hide portions of their nuclear programs and will continue development.

6 posted on 02/14/2007 5:54:31 AM PST by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander

Blithering Stupidty - 1994 all over again. So let me get this straight. We give 'em economic aid and oil in exchange for a solemn "promise" to behave on behalf of NK. Thanks to the moral relativists and multiculturalists of the world we're treating NK with kid gloves

TO ALL HISTORY MAJORS, WATCH INTENTLY, FOR YOU ARE WITNESSING LIVE, MODERN, GEOPOLITICAL APPEASEMENT.

God help us...


7 posted on 02/14/2007 10:01:24 AM PST by ML Capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ML Capitalist
Blithering Stupidty - 1994 all over again. So let me get this straight. We give 'em economic aid and oil in exchange for a solemn "promise" to behave on behalf of NK. Thanks to the moral relativists and multiculturalists of the world we're treating NK with kid gloves

We will also give them bilateral negotiations and will remove from the states sponsoring terrorism list (where they have been since 1988), for no reason discernible to me: 3. The DPRK and the US will start bilateral talks aimed at resolving pending bilateral issues and moving toward full diplomatic relations. The US will begin the process of removing the designation of the DPRK as a state-sponsor of terrorism and advance the process of terminating the application of the Trading with the Enemy Act with respect to the DPRK.

8 posted on 02/14/2007 10:06:53 AM PST by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander
The headling of today's editorial in the Wall Street Journal says it all...

Faith-based Nonproliferation
We'll believe it when Kim Jong Il hands over his plutonium.

9 posted on 02/14/2007 11:26:43 AM PST by The Pack Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander
Does this seem like de javu of Clinton/Albright and/or the Iraq Oil for Food Program??

Of course this is the process suggested in the ISG recommendations for NK, Iran, Syria, etc. Maybe it has a chance but I agree with most of you. They only got to this point because we were tough. Now that we have given in will they revert to character? Probably.
10 posted on 02/14/2007 11:55:28 AM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done, needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

Didn't Clinton and Mad Halfbright try this in 2000?

My God, is that what W is reducing himself to? Clinton-style negotiations? YIKES I fear for my country.


11 posted on 02/14/2007 12:24:16 PM PST by VictoryGal (Never give up, never surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot
Does this seem like de javu of Clinton/Albright and/or the Iraq Oil for Food Program??

It's Agreed Framework, version 2.0; maybe we will send Ms. Albright to make champagne toasts again with Kim Jong-il.

12 posted on 02/14/2007 3:12:15 PM PST by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: VictoryGal

Since the election I have been VERY Disappointed in what I've seen and heard from this whole administration.
President Bush has tried his best to play nice and just get along while being eviserated his whole presidency.
At this point it appears he has lost his way.
Quit spending so damn much on social nonsense that never works.
Close our borders to illegals and throw those out that have come here ILLEGALLY already.
Take a stand on the foreign front against turds like Al Sadr, Kim the Ill, and Almanedjahd.
And for GODs sake quit playing nice with dems who have crapped on you your whole presidency.


13 posted on 02/14/2007 4:47:38 PM PST by Joe Boucher (an enemy of islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson