Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LowCountryJoe

The party either stands for life and liberty or it doesn't.


144 posted on 02/11/2007 5:14:13 PM PST by Jim Robinson ("Electable" gave us Gerald Ford and Bob Dole. Voting for the right-wing kook gave us Reagan. ~ A.C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Robinson

Jim, with all due respect, the "party" doesn't stand for anything. It isn't a top-down organization, it's the loosest of organizations.

Have you met my tagline, BTW?


146 posted on 02/11/2007 5:21:21 PM PST by AmishDude (It doesn't matter whom you vote for. It matters who takes office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
The party better stand for liberty first. Life issues can and should be creatively legislated at the state level, where they should have remained and where they desperately belong. This is the only way to reduce the amount of abortions...if need be through financial incentives that facilitate women to have their children and then give them up for adoption or changing the definition of when a child is technically born (hence creative legislation).

Someone like Duncan Hunter or Tom Tancredo is not going to be an advocate for liberty...and, Jim, whether you like it or not, the GOP needs its libertarian leaning folks. The only solution: embracing the 10th amendment -- as Rudi does -- and learning how to deal with the decision of the local people, largely free of the Washington DC leviathan.

160 posted on 02/11/2007 6:05:12 PM PST by LowCountryJoe (I'm a Paleo-liberal: I believe in freedom; am socially independent and a borderline fiscal anarchist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson