Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trumandogz; narses

I'll address the issue. As far as abortion goes, we have a pro-life President now but we are still having abortions. No president has the power to stop abortion. Rudy has already said he supports strict constructionist judges like John Roberts. He constantly praised the President for appointing Roberts and Alito. He said Roberts is his ideal justice. Assuming Rudy gets elected President and appoints Roberts-like justices then maybe Roe v. Wade will get overturned. But even if it does get overturned I hope you're not naive enough to think that would stop all abortions. The abortion issue would then revert back to the states and do you really think California would outlaw abortions? Of course not!! Being pragmatic in our thinking we all know we can't really stop abortions. Therefore voting solely on this issue very unpragmatic. I hate abortions too but I realize that regardless of how many pro-life presidents we elect, its just not going to stop.


119 posted on 02/03/2007 2:30:06 PM PST by My GOP (Conservatives are realistic and pragmatic!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]


To: My GOP; trumandogz
This is a partial transcript from "Hannity & Colmes," July 20, 2005...

COLMES: Now, on abortion — now, you are pro-choice, right?

GIULIANI: Yes.

COLMES: You're a pro-choice Republican.

GIULIANI: I am.

~snip~

COLMES: Now, Roe vs. Wade -- You are pro-choice. How important is it to you as a pro-choice Republican to have a pro-choice on the court as someone...

GIULIANI: That is not the critical factor. And what's important to me is to have a very intelligent, very honest, very good lawyer on the court. And he fits that category, in the same way Justice Ginsburg fit that category.

I mean, she was — she maybe came at it from a very different political background, very qualified lawyer, very smart person. Lots of Republicans supported her.

122 posted on 02/03/2007 2:31:14 PM PST by narses (St Thomas says "lex injusta non obligat.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

To: My GOP
Being pragmatic in our thinking we all know we can't really stop abortions. Therefore voting solely on this issue very unpragmatic. I hate abortions too but I realize that regardless of how many pro-life presidents we elect, its just not going to stop.

You're proof of the aptness of my tagline.

124 posted on 02/03/2007 2:31:56 PM PST by EternalVigilance (With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

To: My GOP

Remember, Rudy is allied with NARAL. Defend that rather than dance the dance you just did. If you can.


126 posted on 02/03/2007 2:32:20 PM PST by narses (St Thomas says "lex injusta non obligat.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

To: My GOP
Being pragmatic in our thinking we all know we can't really stop abortions. Therefore voting solely on this issue very unpragmatic.

Would you ever support George Pataki for the GOP nomination?

219 posted on 02/03/2007 3:33:27 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson