To: Wormwood
And gee, thinking these things might be explosive devices is almost as silly as...hmmm...flying airplanes into building? Or how about putting explosives into the soles of shoes? Or maybe it's as silly as thinking a pregnant woman might actually be wearing a bomb vest?
185 posted on
02/01/2007 9:33:27 AM PST by
MizSterious
(Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
To: MizSterious
You stay in your bunker. The rest of us have lives to live.
186 posted on
02/01/2007 9:34:27 AM PST by
Wormwood
(Your Friendly Neighborhood Moderate)
To: MizSterious; Wormwood
For all of those who thought that the Boston "authorities" weren't total laughing stocks I have a present for you:
present
190 posted on
02/01/2007 9:38:38 AM PST by
from occupied ga
(Your most dangerous enemy is your own government)
To: MizSterious
Or maybe it's as silly as thinking a pregnant woman might actually be wearing a bomb vest?
So any pregnant woman walking around in public is obviously committing a bomb scare?
194 posted on
02/01/2007 9:41:38 AM PST by
wizecrakker
(Trying to behave)
To: MizSterious
And gee, thinking these things might be explosive devices is almost as silly as...hmmm...flying airplanes into building? Or how about putting explosives into the soles of shoes? Or maybe it's as silly as thinking a pregnant woman might actually be wearing a bomb vest?No, it's much, much sillier. Airplanes, flown into buildings, are potent weapons. A long history of aviation accidents, terrorist plans, and terrorist attacks proves this. Bomb vests are potent weapons. A long history of terrorist attacks proves this. In a confined area, even a shoe bomb may be a potent weapon. Reasoning about the effect of small explosives in airborne planes proves this. These tiny devices, in their context, could not have been potent weapons. Not unless you throw out all experience and reasoning, and operate on fantasy alone.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson