Replies

The solution is right in front of everyone. Lots of people enjoy the physical and spiritual challenge of performing activities that could possibly end with the loss of their lives. The motives behind that desire are really no one elses business. For challenges like attempting Mt. Hood in winter, there should merely be a clearly posted warning that if you climb between X and Y time period, no rescue will be available aside from wholly private efforts.

The alternative is to have a bunch of government boot lickers manadate that activity X is off limits for either certain time periods, or always.

For young healthy people, climbing Mt. Hood is the challenge, but it could be equally life challenging to decide you want to walk 20 blocks when you're 90 years old. If you go down then, you're going to consume the resources of society, and I'd posit that the number of elderly who require recovery from trips to the park or walks around the block FAR exceed the number who require recovery from climbing expeditions.

Having "no public rescue" periods would probably also diminish the number of failed expeditions too, because the perception that you will be rescued probably injects a certain amount of moral hazard insurance into the decision to attempt the activity...

Having "no public rescue" periods would probably also diminish the number of failed expeditions too, because the perception that you will be rescued probably injects a certain amount of moral hazard insurance into the decision to attempt the activity..

Not a bad idea.

For challenges like attempting Mt. Hood in winter, there should merely be a clearly posted warning that if you climb between X and Y time period, no rescue will be available aside from wholly private efforts.

I agree - that's a good solution.