There was evidence in the trial that this was no accident. Several witnesses described the driver as angry and indifferent to the victims after the "accident". There's more to this than the headlines.
I thought he had already been sentenced to prison. Maybe I am getting mixed up with the article a few months ago saying he had been convicted. In any case, this hardly seems like punishment, no matter his age. What's to stop him from driving again??
I agree, the article is written to provoke a blind EMOTIONAL (see feeeeeeeelings) response.
This is not fact based journalism, this is sloppy emotion writing for the BELIEF it will be milked into ratings.
and then greta will have hours of experts and mouse hairs on the air to talk about the "outrage" and the victim families will be on the air crying and telling us they prefer GMs over Fords...