I, for one, would like to see a battle royale over ALL these issues to take place right before the next terroist attack on US soil, preferably sometime in the summer of 2008.
Maybe then the attention-deficient American electorate could manage to hold it in mind that we are in a state of war all the way to the ballot box. Maybe they might consider the consequences BEFORE electing traitors to public office.
We conservatives expected postelection results after 2000, 2002, and 2004. Never happened. Our republican politicians heard us, but didn't listen. Now look where they are. Watch out. The libs are gonna be mad over the next 2 years. Their politicians hear them, but they won't listen. Thank God!
By the DBM/dems trying to please our enemies, domestic and foreign they will end up sinking their ship even before they board! There HATRED for Bush knows no boundries. The next two years are going to be strickly pay back for 2002, and trying to secure a permenate way to remain in power forever!
Hopefully, the liberals should be able to be distracted by impeachment.
In spite of this long and absurd agenda, the issue most dear to the heart of these leftists is their hatred of President Bush.
Two years of subpoenas, hearings, court battles and appeals w/ Bush should be distractive enough to run out the clock and prevent any of the damage that the liberals would like to bring upon the country.
The inherent problem is that Moonbats are great at demanding things--they want the clarity of dictatorship--but they are miserable when they have to bargain for what they want.
For all their talk about the importance of cooperation and how vital it is for people to build a consensus, they show themselves to be the intolerant, arrogant bigots that they are.
Liberal groups are demanding the destruction of America and the ultimate dismantling of our military so they can spend the money on social programs.
Being probably the smallest 6th year gains of the oposition in presidential history, this is NOT a "mandate".
What will be Pelosi's gays-in-the-military moment, when the electorate realizes that she is going way beyond any "mandate" she thought she had, in order to please some interest group she felt she had to placate?
An electorate who votes solely AGAINST a party for real OR trumped up reasons is usually disappointed. An example that comes to mind is Ford vs. Carter.
Wonder if Hillary will be as successful at traingulating between liberals and Bush as Slick Willie was.
DU is flipping out over impeachment "off the table". The nutroots are going to sit on their hands in '08, believe it.
I respectfully disagree.
8 years with Clinton and they never expected results, nor demanded accountability. As long as their party is in charge, some mystical beneficient haze seems to fall over the land.
btt
Free Republic Opinion Poll: I have voted:
| Composite Opinion | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Staying home | 4.3% |   |
366 |
| Third Party | 2.9% | |
251 |
| Member Opinion | |||
| Staying home | 3.2% | |
106 |
| Third Party | 2.2% | |
73 |
| Non-Member Opinion | |||
| Staying home | 5.0% | |
260 |
| Third Party | 3.4% | |
178 |
**************
Elections Have Consequences and some people are more responsible than others!
Now why would "lobbyists for abortion rights" want to "scale back Bush's focus on abstinence education?" Is it a matter of "principle?" Is it because their abortion providers are running a business? I think most sensible people know the answer to those questions.
Time for a tractor-trailer of veto pens to be delivered to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
Screw the Rat Bastard traitors.
This means taxpayer funded abortions. Good luck. It will never pass.
You mean it's not enough to keep yelling "Bush is bad! Bush is bad!"?