Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China's J-11B fighter Presages Quiet Military Revolution
Aviation Week & Space Technology ^ | 11/05/2006 | Douglas Barrie

Posted on 11/07/2006 5:04:59 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

The SU-27

1 posted on 11/07/2006 5:05:01 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy; Genghis Khan; CarrotAndStick; Tommyjo; rmlew; Jeff Head; spetznaz; dervish

Possible Sino-Pak mil-cooperation Ping!!!


2 posted on 11/07/2006 5:08:38 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
China is in the midst of a critical period of testing an "indigenous" version of the Russian Su-27 Flanker, known as the J-11B, with propulsion, radar and weapons system integration underway.

The biggest problem with Chinese fighters: You shoot one down, but minutes later you feel like you still need another.

3 posted on 11/07/2006 5:10:07 AM PST by edpc (Violence is ALWAYS a solution. Maybe not the right one....but a solution nonetheless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

I wouldn't be so dismissive.Their level of training & logistics management have improved significantly since the 80s.The SU-27/30 is a formidable threat for most of China's potential rivals given its combination of agility as well as range.


Another worrying factor is their development of new stand-off munitions.Even if they may not be in the same class as Western ones,it's a huge leap for them.


4 posted on 11/07/2006 5:14:45 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Raptorbait


5 posted on 11/07/2006 5:16:04 AM PST by Toby06 (jon carry is a piece of s#it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Looks like a lot of U.S. design ideas were copied....


6 posted on 11/07/2006 5:20:21 AM PST by John Carey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

ping


7 posted on 11/07/2006 5:21:36 AM PST by snowrip (Liberal? YOU HAVE NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT. Actually, you lack even a legitimate excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

lol


8 posted on 11/07/2006 5:23:30 AM PST by Leatherneck_MT (In a world where Carpenters come back from the dead, ALL things are possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: John Carey

The Su-27 is an indigenous Soviet design, and is worthy of respect, if for no other reason than the fact that the Soviet engineers managed to create a craft with near-US-fighter capabilities (the Su-27 is probably the world's most agile aircraft, despite being damn big, google Pugachev's Cobra) using 1950s technology. The Chinese picked a good base to start from, but as they lack the massive aerospace program the Soviets built, they will have a hard time improving much on the design anytime soon. That being said, this thing is SO raptorbait.


9 posted on 11/07/2006 6:38:52 AM PST by Little Pig (Is it time for "Cowboys and Muslims" yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: Skog

"Russians & Chinese are not in hurry, they have enough time and money to eventually catch up and even overcome technology used in Raptors"

One raptor, in competitive tests against six F15's destroyed all six before it was even seen. And the F15 was viewed as the best fighter in the world.

The Raptor makes the worlds top fighter aircraft obsolete.


11 posted on 11/07/2006 7:26:07 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (Mediacrat - Dinosaur media in bed with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

It is probably being built with the coorperation of Sukhoi.


12 posted on 11/07/2006 7:41:49 AM PST by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Both China and Russia have developed impressive stand-off munitions, air to air missles, and SAM's. They can also track stealth fighters like the F-22.

The worst part is that this stuff could hand up in the hands of Iran.


13 posted on 11/07/2006 7:43:12 AM PST by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

Not all of China's adversaries will get to operate the Raptor.


14 posted on 11/07/2006 7:50:18 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: John Carey
Looks like a lot of U.S. design ideas were copied....

Cheaper and easier than doing it themselves.

The ugly underside to this story is that the Chinese industrial capabilities that make this possible, are the very same ones that get outsourced from the US.

There's always been a national security aspect to outsourcing ... and here it is.

15 posted on 11/07/2006 7:53:41 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

Don't think they can yet effectively track the F-22,let alone have the means of downing it at long-range.


16 posted on 11/07/2006 7:56:51 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90
They can also track stealth fighters like the F-22.

Not to denigrate your post too much, but the fact is that "To Track" = "To Make One's Self Into A Target".

17 posted on 11/07/2006 7:59:41 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
"To Track" = "To Make One's Self Into A Target"
Magnum...
18 posted on 11/07/2006 8:09:56 AM PST by BARLOCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Toby06

There just ain't that many Raptors. There aren't going to be that many Raptors. And Raptors can't operate from carriers - they need bases - which can be reached by the missiles China is building.
We not going to be basing 'em on Taiwan, I think. And Japan is a heck of a trip to get into action. And I wonder what the PRC's response to US fighters operating from Japan would be?

The Su-27/30 is a very capably aircraft and, assuming equal pilot skills, more than capable of defeating the F-16 and F-18s that it is likely to face. If the PLAAF has enough of 'em them, we're in for a hard time.


19 posted on 11/07/2006 8:16:19 AM PST by Little Ray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray
The key to your post lies right here: assuming equal pilot skills,
20 posted on 11/07/2006 8:20:19 AM PST by Toby06 (jon carry is a piece of s#it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson