Let me guess... The NYT will claim that a month before the start of the Iraq war...
- Saddam's envoy agreed to all of Washington's demands including dismantling their nuke program, and Bush went ahead anyway and launched an unnecessary war
- A Q Khan revealed that all of Saddam's nuclear weapons technology was already safely under the control of the IAEA, and Bush went ahead anyway and launched an unnecessary war
- The Bush administration forged documents making it appear that Saddam had a WMD program even though no such program existed, and Bush went ahead anyway and launched an unnecessary war
- The CIA had secretly whisked all of Saddam's nuclear scientists out of Iraq, and Bush went ahead anyway and launched an unnecessary war
- Dick Cheney threatened the CIA director with his shotgun, and would have 'peppered' the guy if the CIA's analysts didn't fake their appraisals of Iraq's nonexistant nuclear capabilities, and Bush went ahead anyway and launched an unnecessary war
- A heretofore secret administration memo concluded that Saddam Hussein did not have any WMD, nor did he have any WMD programs, nor did he have any plans to make WMDs, and Bush went ahead anyway and launched an unnecessary war
- and so on...
Of course, another likely NYT 'story' is that they will claim that Iraq's nuclear technology, plans, and scientists, which were safely contained when Saddam was in power, have since ended up in the hands of Al Quaeda operatives (who were not in Iraq when Saddam was in power)...
Whatever it is, it will have been leaked to the NYT by a staunch Republican who is a patriotic former member of the administration (or the military, or a professional bureaucrat, or FBI agent), whose conscience would no longer permit him to do Bush's evil bidding...