Guess if its negative to the GOP: That Iraq or sorces within the Iraqi govt RECENTLY starting looking into nuke tech, going behind the US's back or with "tacit approval"...leading to the NYT able to talk about how the invasion was worse for potential terrorist activities. It wouldn't take much of a drumming up of secret quotes etc to piece together that kind of story.
Positive-Some kind of ironclad proof that Saddam was dealing in Nuke tech. For this to be true I would posit it would have to be so ridiculously obvious that the NYT can't deny it, and values the "scoop" over the affect of the election.
I had that thought (or something similar) too...see #25 above.
You mean they'd actually have to be paying attention to stuff like the truth about the Niger uranium and the recently declassified docs?
You're right, that is a ridiculous notion!