Former page alleges sexual encounter with disgraced lawmaker

Yahoo news ^ | 10/8/06 | AFP

[Bonaparte]

"So is this unidentified gay male bragging or complaining about his little toot fest with Foley?"

First question to ask is, "Does he even exist?"

We don't know. He hasn't been identified.

Second question to ask -- "Is he a credible source?"

See answer to first question.

Third question to ask is, "Is he telling the truth?"

We don't know that, either. It's just a claim from an anonymous source, unsupported by evidence and announced by the liberal media at election time.

Fourth question to ask is, "Which voters will care what two consenting adults did?"

The answer to that is "social conservatives." Democrats won't care and most Republicans won't care either. So clearly, this "news" story targets the socially conservative voter, a voter who is known to distrust the MSM. That speaks volumes about the MSM's capacity for self-delusion and election time desperation.

[babygene]

"Why would you post a question like that?"

Because it's been in the news a a lot reciently about homosexuals using meth, plus I've suspected for a long time that the politicians in Washington have been "smoking something".

[babygene]

"They can do some pretty disgusting things, but no way is that sex."

I agree with you...