10% of homosexual men are born that way.
So are you saying that those 10% are naturally homosexual?
And if they are natural then why would so many argue that homosexuality is unnatural? Just wondering. Would a better word be "different"?
OKay, let's talk about natural, Joan. Natural as in "according to nature". You know: BIOLOGICAL FACT...
Can a "transgendered" woman become pregnant? Can a "transgendered" man father a child?
Can a homosexual union produce children that they can "parent"?
Hey Joan and the rest here for that matter. I wonder how many of you are homosexual or know homosexuals. I wonder how many of those homosexuals that are afraid to admit they are for fear of being torn apart by you guys.
Oh, hey wasn't foley a homosexual that preyed on homosexual pages in the white house?
Isn't bush anti-homos?
By your logic, we shouldn't regard cancer as a problem, because it's natural. Same thing with genetic mental illness and pretty much anything else someone is born with or develops through no fault of their own. Since being bipolar is natural, why don't we remake our society to their specs and pat ourselves on the back for it?
The poster was making a joke.
Until recently, homosexuality was correctly listed in the DSM-V as a psychological abnormality. So, yes, in as much as some people are born with psychological problems, some people are born gay. Others are recruited. Others decide to be gay for reasons of social acceptance.
Nature created males and females with different sexual organs for the purpose of procreation. Homosexuality is unnatural. (red-herrings about recreational heterosexual sex and infertile heterosexual sex aside.)
It was a joke, dude. Chill.
It is a variation of an old Clinton joke. It wasn't his fault. He didn't want to have sexual relations with that woman. He just got sucked into it.