I apologize if I offended you, but you must see if you allow yourselves to be driven from supporting the party by these "all stink no think" stories, you can expect to see ginned up stuff like this over and over and over again.
How likely is the ABC story that overnight after it printed the innocuous emails, they received the salacious IM's dated years before? Not very, I say. And what does that mean? To me it means that if those are true, people held on to evidence that would have forced the leadership to remove and replace Foley and protect other pages for purely political reasons. Think about THAT.
BUMP!
You likely need to post your stellar comments on every damn thread.