And why, when Clinton hit on interns, was it his "personal sex life"? Funny how things change when it's the other party.
Interns and pages are not the same thing. There is a slight difference when it involves a minor.
Clintoon was a buffoon who took advantage of a subordinate, which is bad enough. But this sicko took advantage of minors entrusted to his case. That's abhorrent.
In D.C. the page was of the age of consent.
But I ask you to focus on the facts and not which party is the most moral. (We know the answer to that one.)
The facts are that like the newspapers which first had and held the story, Hastert had nothing more than innocuous emails and could not pursue this further because the parents insisted the privacy of the complainant be respected. They asked only that Foley stop further contact, and that the Republican leaders demanded of him/