Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: penelopesire
I don't see any cover up here.

Nothing to see here, move along.
Sorry, but it ain't gonna be that easy to brush aside the question, "What did they know, and when did they know it?" Already there are conflicts in the public pronouncements about Leadership's reaction to Foley's "transgressions." Yes, the whole truth must and will be ascertained about other email communications (besides the one instance referenced in the press release) and there is probably more to be revealed as to Foley's "activity."

I do hope there is no complicity to cover this up on the part of Leadership, but just as in the Church scandals often the first reports are not the most complete. We will see in the coming days/weeks if there is more evidence about Foley and what he has done besides a few dozen scandalous emails.

1,504 posted on 09/30/2006 6:39:28 PM PDT by vox_freedom (Matthew 5:37 But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1498 | View Replies ]


To: vox_freedom

>>>I do hope there is no complicity to cover this up on the part of Leadership, but just as in the Church scandals often the first reports are not the most complete. We will see in the coming days/weeks if there is more evidence about Foley and what he has done besides a few dozen scandalous emails.<<<

I would hope the Republican Party would be more forthcoming with the truth about these homosexual scandals within than the Catholic Church has been about its own sordid affairs.


1,506 posted on 09/30/2006 6:49:47 PM PDT by Palladin (Benedict--the New Sobieski?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1504 | View Replies ]

To: vox_freedom

Sorry, but it ain't gonna be that easy to brush aside the question, "What did they know, and when did they know it?" Already there are conflicts in the public pronouncements about Leadership's reaction to Foley's "transgressions." Yes, the whole truth must and will be ascertained about other email communications (besides the one instance referenced in the press release) and there is probably more to be revealed as to Foley's "activity."




It's coming out now that the RATS and MSM knew about this for months if not years. The House GOP leadership were the ones in the dark. Instead of going to the leadership behind the scenes, which would have been the decent thing to do, they sit on it until five weeks before the election and then release it when it would do the most damage. The GOP did the right thing as soon as they found out about it. They should be getting credit instead of being castagated. The real story is the MSM and RATS who sat on this for political purposes.


1,527 posted on 10/01/2006 9:25:27 AM PDT by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1504 | View Replies ]

To: vox_freedom

Wondering about the possibility of other congressbeasts with similar proclities (homosexual or not) with dirty laundry.

My wish would be to shine the light of day on them all and toss out every creep.


1,538 posted on 10/01/2006 8:15:29 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1504 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson