That's a remarkably unfounded statement to make.
I'm arguing that you shouldn't blame Bush for Chapman being arrested for bail-jumping. I'm certainly happy Luster was captured, and would fight for an aquittal for Chapman on the "bounty hunter" charges for that reason.
But how I want the case to turn out is a different question than whether the United States is WRONG to honor a legal and valid request for extradition hearings from a foreign government we have a treaty with. And whether it makes sense to suggest that the President of the United States is personally involved in picking up a 2-bit bounty jumper for the Mexican government because Fox has "something" on him, to name one bizarre conspiracy theory.
Look at his posts this morning. He's on a strafing run. Good only for a chuckle or two.
And Dog(Chapman) was granted a three year grace period for his jumping bail, and still did nothing to rectify the situation.