Skip to comments.
The Certainty of the Written Word of Truth The Lord Christ or the Pope of Rome?
Berean Beacon ^
| Richard Bennett and Robert J. Nicholson
Posted on 08/25/2006 12:39:24 AM PDT by Gamecock
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 last
To: bornacatholic
81
posted on
08/26/2006 4:42:33 PM PDT
by
FJ290
To: Gamecock
You might be suprised to know that a recent Pope also slobbered all over the ring of a homosexual loving Episcopalian Bishop. (But then again maybe we've come to expect such from Rome)Don't ping me again with your inflammatory posts. Didn't you get your fill on that other thread with this? Don't throw stones at glass houses either since the Presbyterians have had their own issues with homosexuals.
The Presbyterian Church USA and Homosexuality
82
posted on
08/26/2006 5:01:53 PM PDT
by
FJ290
To: Gamecock
Since you refer to the actual Catholic website, could you give us the link to it? This looks like something from the illicit SSPX.BTTT
83
posted on
09/07/2006 8:22:30 AM PDT
by
technochick99
( Firearm of choice: Sig Sauer....)
To: FJ290
Don't ping me, I won't ping you.
BTW, I have no connection to the Presbyterian Church USA. IMHO they are apostate and I will never set foot in one. (They aren't even Calvinist anymore.)
84
posted on
09/07/2006 9:17:39 AM PDT
by
Gamecock
(The GRPL: Because life is too short for bad Theology*)
To: technochick99
85
posted on
09/07/2006 9:18:48 AM PDT
by
Gamecock
(The GRPL: Because life is too short for bad Theology*)
To: Gamecock
Those guys are schismatics. On their "Novus Ordo Gallery" page, you'll read:
It is hard to deny any longer that the Novus Ordo service, in any version, is unCatholic, sacrilegious, irreverent, scandalous, blasphemous, idolatrous, and conclusively invalid
People who describe the normative Mass that the Pope of Rome celebrates daily as "sacrilegious", "blasphemous," "idolatrous," and "invalid" are certainly schismatic, if not both schismatic and heretical.
86
posted on
09/07/2006 9:30:48 AM PDT
by
Campion
("I am so tired of you, liberal church in America" -- Mother Angelica, 1993)
To: blue-duncan
So, if Dr. E baptized someone it would be accepted as valid in the RC. Absolutely correct.
The only people who probably can't baptize validly are members of sects that deny the Trinity but use the Trinitarian formula, like Mormons and JWs. The assumption there is that they can't intend Trinitarian baptism because they don't believe in the Trinity, so, even though they say the right words, their intention is defective.
87
posted on
09/07/2006 9:36:02 AM PDT
by
Campion
("I am so tired of you, liberal church in America" -- Mother Angelica, 1993)
To: Campion
FWIW, the Presbyterian Church In America accepts the RC baptism as valid.
88
posted on
09/07/2006 9:49:18 AM PDT
by
Gamecock
(The GRPL: Because life is too short for bad Theology*)
To: markomalley
ROFL!!! I'm glad to know that I'm precious ....
Prrrrrreccciousssssssssss ... < gollum > < gollum >
89
posted on
09/07/2006 10:05:15 AM PDT
by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: Gamecock
oh my goodness...that website is a schismatic sect.
They are not catholic.
You need to read up on the SSPX and sedevanticism.
These are the groups the Gibsons (Hutton and Mel) have aligned themselves with.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson