Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US OKs wider access for Barr 'morning-after' pill (Bush Adminstration Betrays Social Conservatives)
Reuters ^ | 8/24/2006 | n/a

Posted on 08/24/2006 6:26:38 AM PDT by Pyro7480

US OKs wider access for Barr 'morning-after' pill

WASHINGTON, Aug 24 (Reuters) - Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc. (BRL.N: Quote, Profile, Research) won U.S. approval to sell its Plan B "morning-after" contraceptive without a prescription to women 18 and older, the company said on Thursday.

Younger girls still need a prescription for Plan B, the company said in a statement. The Plan B pills may prevent pregnancy when taken within 72 hours of sexual intercourse.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; birthcontrolpill; bush; bushbash; contraception; fda; holyrollers; misleadingheadline; planb; prolife; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-152 next last
To: hocndoc

That settles it for me.

Thank you. I'm pro-"Plan B".


101 posted on 08/24/2006 4:26:40 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

Plan B doesn't kill a human zygote.

But don't let that get in the way of your rant.


102 posted on 08/24/2006 4:28:12 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

I think contraception is a personal choice.

Killing a human is not.

Do you not understand the difference?


103 posted on 08/24/2006 4:30:55 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

I don't believe the President should play to the ignorance of social conservatives instead of doing what is right.

If they are too stupid to learn the difference between contraception and and abortion, that's their problem.


104 posted on 08/24/2006 4:34:14 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: GinaLolaB

Maybe it's your ignorance that sees inconsistency where none exists.


105 posted on 08/24/2006 4:35:39 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

And what about rape? Can rape victims have access to Plan B, which is NOT an abortifacient?


106 posted on 08/24/2006 4:38:36 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Scholastic
What a baby killer is right. Im so glad I voted for Peroutka. Thanks much for the post.

You forgot your sarcasm tag.

107 posted on 08/24/2006 4:42:13 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason

I'm not quite "pro-plan B."

I believe that the preliminary work has been done, but I'd like more evidence. I'm convinced it doesn't change the rates of pregnancies and abortions to a significant level.
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=17316

I've published some of the best evidence we currently have on FR at
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1689548/posts


108 posted on 08/24/2006 4:42:46 PM PDT by hocndoc (http://www.lifeethics.org/www.lifeethics.org/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
I am a loyal Bush supporter. I don't sometimes agree with him on some of the things he does or the decisions he makes. I recognize that I may not have all the facts and give him the benefit of the doubt. Sometimes I think he is just plain wrong but again, I give him that he may look at things different than I do.

This time I am completely blown away as to why he has supported the Plan B pill. I think, at the minimum, he needs to explain himself and why he chose this decision. I would like to give him a chance to explain himself before I condemn his action. I do not think it will be easy to explain out of this one but I would like to at least hear what he has to say about his reasoning.

109 posted on 08/24/2006 4:44:29 PM PDT by tryon1ja
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Plan B is of course an abortifacient, it destroys life after conception which is when life begins.

The FDA nomination was being held up by Senators Hillary Clinton and Patty Murray and this decision led them to back down.

So this is a White House cave to Hillary, too.

Planned Parenthood is unhappy that minors can't get it but so what older girls can get it for younger ones. This 18-year old rule will be bent and broken worse than the cigarette age limit which is being more strictly enforced.

I think PP is shedding crocodile tears. They got a big step forward in their plans to replace surgical abortions with chemical ones (Plan B).

The White House spins the minors thing, too. They beat their chests that minors will not have access but this abortion inducing drug will now be more easily available than ever before.


110 posted on 08/24/2006 4:49:12 PM PDT by Nextrush (Chris Matthews Band: "I get high...... I get high.....I get high.....McCain.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
I totally agree with you, but your comment didn't address my point.....which was......right or wrong, those conservatives in the base who don't find out what things are all about and who don't care to educate themselves will knee-jerkily castigage the President for this.

It will be very harmful in the next election because the media will spin it so that it looks bad for Bush.....and the presstitutes won't let it die if they can turn pro-lifers voters against the Republicans in any way.

Leni

111 posted on 08/24/2006 4:57:34 PM PDT by MinuteGal (Israel, Hold Firm !................No Retreat means No Repeat !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason

There is no difference, if there is already a human present. Human life begins at conception.


112 posted on 08/24/2006 5:06:42 PM PDT by Pyro7480 ("Love is the fusion of two souls in one in order to bring about mutual perfection." -S. Terese Andes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe

"Life begins at conception. To prevent implantation is to kill an innocent human being.
Wrong, and wrong. Don't flaunt your ignorance."

You have a moral duty to be better informed than that. Shame on you.

Of course life begins at conception. There is no coherent argument for any other position.


113 posted on 08/24/2006 9:20:17 PM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason

"Plan B doesn't kill a human zygote."

Plan B, if conception occurs, kills an innocent human being.

But don't let that stand in the way of your quest for consequence-free depravity.


114 posted on 08/24/2006 9:21:33 PM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480; GatorGirl; maryz; afraidfortherepublic; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; livius; goldenstategirl; ..

+



115 posted on 08/24/2006 9:23:08 PM PDT by narses (St Thomas says “lex injusta non obligat”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason

"And what about rape? Can rape victims have access to Plan B, which is NOT an abortifacient?"

No, they can only have access to Plan B which IS an abortifascient.

Plan B which is not an abortifascient is a myth, like the unicorn.


116 posted on 08/24/2006 9:23:59 PM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife

Oy...your post is just too logical for the fanatics here to grasp.


117 posted on 08/24/2006 9:27:11 PM PDT by Hildy (Faith is not believing that God can. It is knowing that God will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dsc

See my 75 or this thread http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1689548/posts


118 posted on 08/24/2006 9:27:23 PM PDT by hocndoc (http://www.lifeethics.org/www.lifeethics.org/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: dsc

Not according to latest research.

And this the part where I DON'T make ridiculous assumptions about your sex life.


119 posted on 08/24/2006 10:17:13 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: dsc

Not according to latest research.

And this the part where I DON'T make ridiculous untoward assumptions about your personal life.


120 posted on 08/24/2006 10:21:43 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-152 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson