[Fester Chugabrew]

Your replies are what constitute sophomoric musing (if they even rise to such a level). You've not supplied any form of scientific hypothesis to determine the distinction between natural and supernatural, but assert the distinction as necessary to science. You've also failed to give a single reason why intelligent design should be considered supernatural when you continually and "naturally" employ the same.

[freedumb2003]

Your replies are what constitute sophomoric musing (if they even rise to such a level). You've not supplied any form of scientific hypothesis to determine the distinction between natural and supernatural, but assert the distinction as necessary to science. You've also failed to give a single reason why intelligent design should be considered supernatural when you continually and "naturally" employ the same.

LOLOL! You're killing me here. Fester! A "scientific hypothesis to determine the distinction between natural and supernatural!" ROTFLMAO! You're killing me!

Have (yet) another beer on me.