Three pillars of liberalism - moral relativity, the sexual "revolution" and the obsession with "rights" - are on a collision course..... Duh. Who knew? (/sarc)
1 posted on
08/18/2006 3:55:10 AM PDT by
Liz
To: Liz
having sex with children "is a sacred ritual protected by civil-rights laws......I've been a pedophile for 20 years. The only reason I'm charged with rape is that no one believes a child can consent to sex..........." .22 cal .. twice behind the left ear
2 posted on
08/18/2006 3:57:18 AM PDT by
tx_eggman
(Islamofascism ... bringing you the best of the 7th century for the past 1300 years.)
To: Liz
We kneecappers have rights too, y'know!
3 posted on
08/18/2006 3:57:43 AM PDT by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: Liz
Not surprised by this.
I'm expecting the criminals to start crying the same tune!
4 posted on
08/18/2006 3:58:37 AM PDT by
beachn4fun
("Oh, Lord, please let me win the Lottery so that I can FReep all day.")
To: Liz
Pedophiles are just a misunderstood and persecuted minority. One day, people will see sex between adults and children as natural as sex between adults of the same sex. And we will wonder why we were bigoted for so long. Its just a matter of time before we stop hating every one except for Bush. He's totall evil.
(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo!)
5 posted on
08/18/2006 3:58:39 AM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Liz
Well, if "no one believes a child can consent to sex..." then why did this sick pedophile only attack physically and mentally handicapped boys? Why not try to rape a perfectly sound and healthy young boy?
Because just like young Jeffery Curley of Boston, a normal little boy would fight to the death. The two murderers of Jeffery were caught with lots of NAMBLA literature, and the NAMBLA people support them while they serve their sentences, including Christmas cards.
Now, about the "civil rights", I think Jeffery Curley had the right not to be raped, murdered, and thrown in a river in a Rubbermaid container. But that's just me...
6 posted on
08/18/2006 4:03:21 AM PDT by
ishabibble
(ALL-AMERICAN INFIDEL)
To: Liz
I recall a Star Trek (TOS) episode where people were peacefully led to a disintegration chamber. I am sure we have the technology. We're are getting to the time where tough decisions are going to have to be made, by imperfect men and women, where we will just have to trust in the Lord to let the chips fall where they may.
7 posted on
08/18/2006 4:07:03 AM PDT by
Harrius Magnus
(Repeal the Seventeenth Amendment!)
To: Liz
Doesn't the American Psychological Association (APA) agree with him, as they're trying to "normalize" pedophilia.
8 posted on
08/18/2006 4:09:58 AM PDT by
BobL
(Just go to http://www.brusselsjournal.com/blog/4556 and read.)
To: Liz
You know, the vast majority of liberals that I know would also encourage a few shots to the back of this guy's head. And as a liberal, I can agree with that sentiment, as well.
And also, there is good reason to believe that there is a biological link to pedophilia...http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3077083/ is just one example of this. Though I doubt anyone, including the vast majority of liberals, would take people seriously if they tried to say all pedophiles are such. A great deal of it is to be found in their upbringing and a whole lot of other factors.
And please don't flame me for being a liberal. I enjoy the site for bringing up stories I don't always catch, so I do lurk here often.
To: Liz
The only reason I'm charged with rape is that no one believes a child can consent to sex........... There is a reason for that you baby raper.
BTW you not only go after kids, you go after handicapped kids making you even lower pond scum.
12 posted on
08/18/2006 4:24:28 AM PDT by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(A propensity to hope and joy is real riches; one to fear and sorrow, real poverty)
To: Liz
17 posted on
08/18/2006 4:33:40 AM PDT by
Beckwith
(The dhimmicrats and liberal media have chosen sides and they've sided with the Jihadists.)
To: Liz
18 posted on
08/18/2006 4:35:34 AM PDT by
lionheart 247365
(( I.S.L.A.M. stands for - Islams Spiritual Leaders Advocate Murder .. .. .. ))
To: Liz
The concepts behind the pedo scum argument and the author of this article are both very dangerous.
The pedo-scum thinks that his "right" (and there can be no such thing as the right to rape) to fill his perverted desire is greater then that of children to be free from coercion and force.
The author of the article intimates that, regardless of the merits of the argument, it stems in part from an "obsession of rights". As Americans we better be obsessed with maintaining our rights. The author should refrain from lumping delusional arguments from any claim to actual rights.
24 posted on
08/18/2006 5:29:51 AM PDT by
Durus
("Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." JFK)
To: Liz
My argument for 30+ years has been..
To my knowledge all discrimination laws state something like 'no discrimination due to sexual preference'.
IMHO,It follows that any sexual deviancy is legal.
I've been sitting back and waiting for a judge to follow the letter of the law.
31 posted on
08/18/2006 6:32:31 AM PDT by
Vinnie
To: Liz
Welcome to Post-Judeo-Christian America.
"Without G-d, all things are possible"...
54 posted on
08/19/2006 6:51:04 AM PDT by
VOA
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson