Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: infowarrior
Even *that* is actually incorrect (off by one). The "real" First World War occurred approximately 100 years before the acknowledged First World War did. The first "world war" in man's history was the Napoleonic Wars (1805-1815), as campaigns were actually fought globally, and societies were totally reshaped in both the fightuing itself, and the aftermath, around the globe...

A middle phase began with the declaration of war between France and Britain, and touched off the first true world war (Seven Years’ War). The North American conflict might well have remained a localized affair, but a realignment of European alliances ignited new rivalries to add to the simmering feud between Britain and France.

7 posted on 08/04/2006 11:39:07 PM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: neverdem
While it could be claimed that The Seven Years' War was the first "world war" with some plausibility, the fact that the Napoleonic Wars did far more to reshape the world tends to push me to grant the title to that conflict. In fact, it would not be a stretch to combine the two into one larger conflict, with an interregnum of uneasy peace and "cold war" between the major belligerents between the two metacampaigns...

the infowarrior

8 posted on 08/04/2006 11:50:28 PM PDT by infowarrior (The GOP runs the US, the Dems run their mouths... Freeper HardStarboard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson