[jjbrouwer]

Ah, the dreaded "L" word. I could post any number of links. You would no doubt dismiss her critics as "Liberals" so you can do your own research. Funny how you rant on about personal attacks and your own posts are equally rude.

Actually, the victims have the right to express their views without being attacked by keyboard commandos like you or evil old hags like Coulter.

[BruceysMom]

Evil old hag? So are you blind? You may not like her or think she's pretty but if you think she's old you must be about 15. Does your mom know you're on the internet?

[perfect stranger]

Actually, the victims have the right to express their views without being attacked by keyboard commandos like you or evil old hags like Coulter.

It seems to me that you should also agree with Maureen Dowd's assertion that Cindy Sheehan has 'absolute moral authority'.

[gabidale89]

"Actually, the victims have the right to express their views without being attacked by keyboard commandos like you or evil old hags like Coulter."

So no victim can ever be attacked, no matter what their views are? In Ann's book, she writes at the end of the "Jersey Girls" chapter a possible scenario:

"Today, a Democrat called for the institution of Communism in America, confiscation of all private property, forcible agricultural collectivization, imprisonment of intellectuals, and seizure of all handguns - moments before her entire family was wiped out in a tornado. Responses?"

Imagine this scenario and apply your logic. We wouldn't be allowed to criticize this person solely because she is a victim.

I will say that Ann Coulter, I think, was a little too harsh in her words - but her main point was absolutely spot on.