Skip to comments.
U.N. panel takes U.S. to task over Katrina
AP ^
| 7/28/06
| BRADLEY S. KLAPPER,
Posted on 07/28/2006 10:50:17 AM PDT by SF Republican
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
To: SF Republican
You can't make this stuff up, seriously. I don;t seem to hear much about Chinese Authorities harvesting Falun Gong practitioner's organs, or bitching about the horribly racist caste system in India. No, only the US, always the US FOREVER THE US. F#$K THE F#^cking UN.
41
posted on
07/28/2006 11:44:16 AM PDT
by
steel_resolve
(Do you know what a bigot is? Someone winning an argument with a liberal.)
To: SF Republican
Kofi, if I were you, and I'm not, thank goodness, but IF I were, I think with all the theft, rapings, drug smugling that has been going on, on YOUR watch, it might seem very intelligent to 'STFU'........
42
posted on
07/28/2006 11:46:14 AM PDT
by
HarleyLady27
(My ? to libs: "Do they ever shut up on your planet?" "Grow your own DOPE: Plant a LIB!")
To: samadams2000
All the land the UN is on would make nice apartments for New Yorkers and might help lower some local housing costs.
Or New York could use the land to build a super high-rise office building which would inject a heap of money into the local area and expand the economy there.
New York could also just build a huge park for people to enjoy.
The bottom line is, the only time the UN will ever improve free peoples' lives is when it leaves, or even better, ceases to exist.
43
posted on
07/28/2006 11:47:03 AM PDT
by
M1Tanker
(Proven Daily: Modern "progressive" liberalism is just National Socialism without the "twisted cross")
To: pbrown
Yes. The only way the UN ever listens or ceases to exist is when we take their purse away. Of course, until Americans get angry enough, it will not happen. But few out there seem brave enough to actually stop funding the UN.
But, as the the last Axis of evil found out, invoking the true anger of America is not something one wants.
44
posted on
07/28/2006 11:52:42 AM PDT
by
M1Tanker
(Proven Daily: Modern "progressive" liberalism is just National Socialism without the "twisted cross")
To: SF Republican
....I'm sorry, was the UN whining again?
To: SF Republican
Let me add my outrage to this report. This is one of the most pressing "human right" issues of our time, please. Needless to say the timing is suspect.
Now if my fellow freeper's blood pressure can take it, this report cost the US taxpayer $25-50 million. I read in "the UN Gang", every UN report is reprinted in every language known to man, simply so the cronies can skim money off "translator fees" of which YOUR paying a quarter of the bill.
To: M1Tanker
But, as the the last Axis of evil found out, invoking the true anger of America is not something one wants.Keep in mind the '04 elections, of those who voted to support kerry, they also supported a stronger role for the un in our country. Time is quickly running out (in the number sense) for we Americans who see the un for what it really is. We are being over ran and soon to be out numbered by the socialist, leftist who agree with the un.
I would word my response more strongly, but.....
Please: NO profanity, NO personal attacks, NO racism or violence in posts.
I fall into the last 4 words category.
47
posted on
07/28/2006 12:01:50 PM PDT
by
processing please hold
(If you can't stand behind our military, stand in front of them.)
To: Txsleuth
48
posted on
07/28/2006 12:04:03 PM PDT
by
RDTF
("We love death. The US loves life. That is the big difference between us two.” Osama Bin laden)
To: rightinthemiddle
What America's response is to emergency events is none of the U.N.'s business. Butt out!
BTW - It's time we kicked the U.N. out of the U. S. All in favor, say SCAT!!!!!
Beirut Lebanon would be a good place to relocate the U.N.
To: SF Republican
To: theDentist
To: MotleyGirl70
Talk about the appropriate politcal cartoon..... good find.
52
posted on
07/28/2006 12:17:30 PM PDT
by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
To: traditional1
International law is not part of the Constitution of this country, and we don't need a bunch of Third World idiots telling us how to take care of ourselves. Our Soverignty is at stake, and we don't need the U.N. in our internal affairs.
Wonderfully well said.
To: SF Republican
There are no words to express my thoughts on this piece,
so I guess I have nothing to say ???
To: R.W.Ratikal
I know the perfect place to "Stick the UN", but, (No profanity, No personal attacks, No racism or violence etc.)
To: Bearshouse; traditional1
56
posted on
07/28/2006 12:54:35 PM PDT
by
processing please hold
(If you can't stand behind our military, stand in front of them.)
To: Txsleuth
I'm going to go with dirtboy's response (see #3). The effing nerve!!!!
57
posted on
07/28/2006 1:00:54 PM PDT
by
Bahbah
(Pulverize them,, IDF. G_d bless Israel)
To: Bahbah
LOL....the perfect answer.
58
posted on
07/28/2006 1:05:59 PM PDT
by
Txsleuth
((((((((ISRAEL)))))))))
To: SF Republican
The UN's 2 cents Looks like they want a hand in the $200 billion recovery cost funding.
59
posted on
07/28/2006 1:08:30 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: pbrown
"Justice Kennedy's majority opinion in Lawrence v. Texas, which declared unconstitutional state laws prohibiting homosexual sodomy, in part, by considering decisions of the European Court of Human Rights"I know a little about that decision, and the Liberal Justice who made the ridiculous argument citing non-binding considerations he used.
Also, Ginsberg is the worst of the bunch, with her ACLU-based bias and background that she brought to the Bench, and if Bush doesn't have the opportunity to appoint at least one more Scalia or Thomas to the bench (AND the Republicans hold a majority in the Senate and break the illegal filibustering of the Leftists there), then the Constitution may be un-savable for the foreseeable future, as the Liberals will continue to pack the courts and subvert the Constitution with re-interpretations and non-U.S.-based decisions like the one in Lawrence vs. Texas (the striking of the Texas sodomy statute).
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson