Back briefly from supper B4 hitting the sack.
Anyway, yeah, that's what I mean about Southack getting a little "impatient" sometimes (and his/her analysis contains part of the lead-in to my question for him/her.)
To be fair to Southack, as I recall, he/she did not insist the missile did not have Iranian markings. Southack's argument was that everyone was flipping out that the missile was reportedly fired BY Iranian troops in Lebanon, when in fact that was not confirmed.* Or, maybe that was a different argument. But I think everyone is agreed that the Hezzies have been supplied by Iran with Iranian missiles.
*To be sure it was reported that way, but I think we all need to keep in mind how much of the Katrina reporting turned out to be flat wrong. Not to mention "Shep'ed".
Hey, HAHA - we can all start a new mild cuss word: 'What a piece of "Shep".'