Posted on 07/07/2006 8:58:04 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
What am I misinterpreting? Seems rather clear to me. I get the same direct mail from this folks as everyone else gets in their mailbox. It doesnt take much to see that many of these groups are related. Conservative debate has taken a unnecessary and imho destructive nasty turn that will in the end depress our turnout. You can't build a party of get the voters out by making them angry and scared 24/7. After a while they burn out and turn against it. This stuff is going to kill us in the end. We are starting to sound like the crazy folks at Dem Undergrounds, Kos, and other places that think Bush and all their crazy theories. We are becoming what we hated. The rethoric has got to come down a tad or two.
OMG! He is delusional.
I posted there a couple times, when FRiends departed during the Shiavo ugliness.
He seems to think everybody on that site was banned from here, which is NOT the case. I resent their slams and ugly posts against and about Jim, so I've had nothing to do with the site since the Shiavo.
That was a mistake. That was from a site that is from Idaho that is all worked over the klan. They had a origina; article that I wished to excerptethat I thought was amusing about this show that even I sometimes watch. When I cutted and paste the last word of their commentary got in.
I have been pretty consistent on this. One reason that Simcox has gotten into trouble is some radicals that were involved left. Let me clarify, that would be Joe McClutcheon and his wife and a few others. Both were involved and notorious anti semites. Was Simcox aware of this at the time? Perhaps not. Now they are spreading theories of scary neo cons and one world govt types being involved with Somcox's groups. They are refering to the Driener group. OF course I don't see a Jeswish conspriacy like they do. I have other concerns. So there is defiantly no klan or extremist like Storm front involved with Simcox right now. I think I have been pretty consistent ioth that thought on this thread.
I was banned from CP for discussing the Schiavo case with Sabertooth, he was banned as well.
Toothy and I were going at it like old times here in FR, very politely but posting some rather lengthy arguments on the issue, and the CP harpies decided that Toothy and I couldn't discuss the issue, so they told us to shut up, and attacked the both of us.
That had the weirdest effect...Toothy and I ended up on the same side battling CP's harpies. Well, the Mod banned both of us for responding to the attacks. Funny thing was, that the creator of the site had ASKED me to argue with Toothy in an attempt to get him banned.
When the Mod warmed me that arguing with Toothy would get me banned, I posted the e-mail from the site's creator asking me to take Toothy out, and promising that he's "have my back" with the Mods.
Toothy and I were banned, the site's creator left for a while, and they resumed their irrelevant banter after that.
Funny...their being gone has left no void.
FOTFLOL!
I've been offline for several days so this may have been posted here and you may have seen it.
LOL. Yes the Dogs are on the inside of the fence. Perfectly legal. The tall fence is topped with razor wire. Perfectly legal. The missing ingredients are the ground level razor wire and anti-vehichle trenches. Now show me the pictures of that hotshot. Dogs inside a fence are not booby traps, hidden pits and Razor-wire on the ground placed on the incoming side of the fence are.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.