[SolidSupplySide]

Your fantastic prognostication skills did not extend to predicting the DeLay-Campbell race properly.

Yeah, I predicted DeLay would win with 60% of the vote (see over-under). DeLay won with 62%. I concede I was off on that. But I was certainly closer than anyone else!

You are confusing me wanting Campbell to win the primary and me predicting Campbell would win the primary. I predicted both DeLay's margin of victory and his eventual problems in the general with uncanny accuracy.

[Quick1]

I should have figured you didn't really need any help defending yourself. :)

[AmishDude]

That is quite possibly the most shameful wuss-out of a prediction I have ever seen. You predict everything with a 30% chance of happening (approx.) so whatever happened, you would say you predicted it.

That is not a prediction. I can give a lecture on probability theory if you like. Well, as to an actual Campbell victory, that you correctly "predicted" as not happening.

Your spite is not that you couldn't fan the Earle charges enough to dump DeLay in the primaries, but that if DeLay were replaced, it would not be with Campbell.