1 posted on
07/06/2006 9:28:25 AM PDT by
AntiGuv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: AntiGuv
How in the heck can a judges ruling be 'confirmed' by an opponent??? The Houston Chronicle is a silly lib-rag.
2 posted on
07/06/2006 9:30:07 AM PDT by
keithtoo
(The GOP is fortunate that the Dim's are even more spineless and disorganized.)
To: AntiGuv
Two words.....Bob Toricelli.
To: AntiGuv
4 posted on
07/06/2006 9:31:20 AM PDT by
rhombus
To: Torie; Clintonfatigued; fieldmarshaldj; crasher; Kuksool; AuH2ORepublican; LdSentinal; ...
5 posted on
07/06/2006 9:31:23 AM PDT by
AntiGuv
("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
To: AntiGuv
But Democrats are allowed to remove a NJ Democrat Senate canidate from the ballot 7 days prior to the state wide election.
6 posted on
07/06/2006 9:31:45 AM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(Fire Murtha Now! Spread the word. Support Diana Irey. http://www.irey.com/)
To: AntiGuv
Texas Democratic Party spokeswoman Amber Moon. Far Out.
It would be so funny if DeLay won.
To: AntiGuv
And Lautenburg became Senator because the Democrats did what?
Of course, that's in the past, we're talking about now.....
9 posted on
07/06/2006 9:32:45 AM PDT by
stylin_geek
(Liberalism: comparable to a chicken with its head cut off, but with more spastic motions)
To: AntiGuv
"U.S. District Judge Sam Sparks, a Republican appointee, ruled that DeLay must appear..."I wonder if the writer would have mentioned it if the judge were a Democrat appointee. He seems to think adding that Sparks is a Republican appointee adds weight to his story.
10 posted on
07/06/2006 9:33:06 AM PDT by
RabidBartender
(an ex-fan of the Dixie Chicks)
To: AntiGuv
If the appeal fails, he should campaign and win. That would be a schadenfreudische feast!
11 posted on
07/06/2006 9:33:34 AM PDT by
Petronski
(I just love that woman.)
To: AntiGuv
Its funny. The Democrats wanted to get rid of DeLay, then decided they couldn't live without him!
(The Palestinian terrorist regime is the crisis and Israel's fist is the answer.)
12 posted on
07/06/2006 9:35:38 AM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: AntiGuv
It'll probably end up at Texas SC, and he'll be removed from the ballot. Don't ya know a dimwit can't win honestly. So we always end up in court.
13 posted on
07/06/2006 9:35:58 AM PDT by
shield
(A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc. 10:2)
To: AntiGuv
screw it. Delay should run.
I'll send him $100 if he says "........the courts won't let me quit. I am going to run and I am going to win!"
15 posted on
07/06/2006 9:36:41 AM PDT by
rface
("...the most schizoid freeper I've ever seen" - New Bloomfield, Missouri)
To: AntiGuv
Thanks. I've made my decision on how I'm voting, heehee.
18 posted on
07/06/2006 9:38:29 AM PDT by
mtbopfuyn
(I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
To: AntiGuv
I GUARANTEE you that the Fifth Circuit will overturn this ruling.
There is no way they're going to allow a MAJORITY republican district to be disenfranchised by not having a Republican on the ballot!
Sparks can't see the forest for the trees.
19 posted on
07/06/2006 9:41:01 AM PDT by
Elpasser
To: AntiGuv
Delay should run. Absolutely, positively.
To: AntiGuv
I hope DeLay runs and whips the Socialist's sorry butt!
26 posted on
07/06/2006 9:51:01 AM PDT by
Redleg Duke
(¡Salga de los Estados Unidos de América, invasor!)
To: AntiGuv
28 posted on
07/06/2006 9:56:59 AM PDT by
evad
To: AntiGuv
Absolute insanity!
41 posted on
07/06/2006 10:19:22 AM PDT by
KoRn
To: AntiGuv
U.S. District Judge Sam Sparks, a Republican appointee, ruled that DeLay must appear on the Nov. 7 ballot as the GOP nominee for the congressional seat that DeLay abandoned last month. Sparks ruling was confirmed by Texas Democratic Party spokeswoman Amber Moon.
Details of Sparks ruling were not immediately available.
Sparks ruling halts the process of replacing DeLay on the ballot, but the GOP is expected to appeal the decision to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.
Damn shame, that poor Mr. Ratcliffe has to deal with having no apostrophe.
47 posted on
07/06/2006 10:23:37 AM PDT by
Xenalyte
(I want you to remember this face. This is the guy behind the guy behind the guy.)
To: AntiGuv
I am hoping Delay wins.. and big time.. sort of like a landslide.. faces of stunned democrats? priceless!
51 posted on
07/06/2006 10:26:10 AM PDT by
Cinnamon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson