Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jamiefoxer

So I guess you don't concur that Rov V Wade should be protected by stare decisis?


602 posted on 06/29/2006 9:18:35 AM PDT by dotnetfellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 593 | View Replies ]


To: dotnetfellow

Roe V. Wade is a seperate issue. I tend to think it was RIGHTLY decided, but again, that's up to our Court to decide, our Congress to argue/debate...and ultimately, for the American people to agitate or NOT agitate in favor or against it.

That has nothing to do with how we treat terrorists we capture, or legitimate POWs.

Procedures to follow, in a nutshell.

If Al-Qaeda, try, prove, find guilty or innocent, and either IMPRISON (if guilty) or release (if innocent).
If legitimate POW, hold in appropriate facility humanely with oversight from Congress and SCOTUS, and release after end of our wars.

Simple LEGAL procedures we can follow that maintain our national security AND maintain our rule of law/values.


623 posted on 06/29/2006 9:23:59 AM PDT by jamiefoxer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 602 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson