[VadeRetro]

Remember that someone with your dazzling resume--thanks for posting it, BTW--and your previous vast understanding of evolution could probably provide a level of description thereof better than the standard creationist strawman. So, please, no "Goo to you, via the zoo," or "One day there was this paramecium thing and it turned into a snail and the snail turned into a rat, but where was there a female rat for it to mate with?"

[js1138]

A 4.0 GPA. That's interesting. Mostly we hear how crappy schools and colleges are, but suddenly they are something to brag about.

[Jorge]

I wouldn't say my resume is "dazzling" as there are plenty of very smart and accomplished people on both sides of this debate.

I have just come to the conclusion that creationists are correct on this, and will come out on top ultimately.
Wait and see.

[RunningWolf]

But see 'you guys' are taking an analogy (Goo to you, via the zoo) and making it into a straw-man and then you might even insert it yourself if 'the opponent' does not, while at the same time 'the other side' is supposed to automatically interpret your analogies correctly.

When I don't see those sort of things going 50-50 I guess thats one part that draws out the defensive negativity in my posts. Its more to the dynamics of the threads than any greater arguments-debates.

See from my POV, what the reality is will remain ultimately remain an unknown and beyond man. If I am to be attacked on anything attack me on that.

Now does that mean I try to compete against 'you guys' with pixes and fairies ?? NO!! and why should anyone suggest so, if not but a reflection upon them?

While this post is to you Vade, its not about you per se, but more an overall observation to one piece of the crevo debate dynamics.

Wolf