Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GourmetDan
Speciation, genetic load, sexual reproduction, deleterious mutation, DNA error-correction schemes, diploid genetic structure and triplet-codon coding structure.

All either evidence of decline or features designed to resist decline.

How have you determined that decline resistance is "designed"?
777 posted on 07/06/2006 9:45:42 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 776 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio

Whether or not it is designed is not the question.

You can (and evos do) assume RM+NS *designed* these features, do you not?

I merely point out that, either RM+NS has 'designed' features that intentionally slow the very evolution that created them in favor of conserving existing information and resist decline (a rather remarkable and fortunate change of direction for a 'directionless' process) *or* life was intelligently-designed to conserve existing information and resist decline.

Either way, that life was *designed* to conserve existing information and resist decline is not in question.


783 posted on 07/06/2006 5:48:54 PM PDT by GourmetDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 777 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson