[celmak]

I fail to see how this declaration is a net gain for anti-evolutionists since it does not declare the signers as anti-evolutionists.

Too bad you fail to see this as a sign that we are winning. Of course, many Democrats failed to see faith as a winning block of voters in 2004; e.g., a winning block of Conservative SCOTUS judges that will vote to overturn the bigotry against Creation being taught along side Evolution in our schools.

[andysandmikesmom]

Do you really believe that the SCOTUS will vote to allow Creation to be taught alongside of Evolution in science classes in our schools?

[OmahaFields]

But you lost the first/last test of constitutionality of teaching religion in the science class.

[b_sharp]

"Too bad you fail to see this as a sign that we are winning. Of course, many Democrats failed to see faith as a winning block of voters in 2004; e.g., a winning block of Conservative SCOTUS judges that will vote to overturn the bigotry against Creation being taught along side Evolution in our schools.

You seem to like making unfounded and illogical jumps in your conclusions. The list of names on Di's list may be growing but it is still much smaller than the number of scientists represented by the list of 'Steves' (a list of scientists named 'Steve' who support evolution). Currently the 'list of steves' represents 68,800 scientists. (Steves make up about 1% of Americans. As of Dec. 2005 688 Steves have signed the list)

What bigotry?