More scientists express doubts on Darwin

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | June 22, 2006 1:00 a.m. Eastern

[Ichneumon]

[Several of those skull images are most likely composites, built up of undefined & unknown numbers of skeletal remains.]

This was found to be the case with previous so-called "missing link" skulls...

No it wasn't, but thanks for sharing your fantasies with us.

and as a result I am sceptical of anything evolutionists present since.

Then by your own admission, your actually skepticism is based on your unfounded and incorrect presumptions, and has nothing to do with the actual state of the real evidence, of which you seem blisfully unaware.

[RunningWolf]

I did to read the post, and your chart also.

In fact believe it or not I have read into several of the example in the chart/s over the months. I have had on my to-do list to bring some of the work here.

I might not convince you, but at the same time when I do bring it here I hope to do it in a way that stimulates some positive objective introspection to the whole subject.

If for nothing else, I want to 'prove to the forum' I have that in me :-)

Hopefully the drive-by hit artists will be on vacation then, its hard to have a dialog with all that going on.

W.

[Coyoteman]

Hopefully the drive-by hit artists will be on vacation then, its hard to have a dialog with all that going on.

I look forward to a dialog (almost) anytime.

[Jorge]

"This was found to be the case with previous so-called "missing link" skulls..."

No it wasn't, but thanks for sharing your fantasies with us.

Uh, yes it was.

But the last thing I expect from evolutionists is an admission of their own embarrassing historic blunders. LOL!

[js1138]

But the last thing I expect from evolutionists is an admission of their own embarrassing historic blunders. LOL!

Admitting mistakes is a characteristic of science.

I am still waiting for you to present a brief summary of evolution n your own words.

[Jorge]

Then by your own admission, your actually skepticism is based on your unfounded and incorrect presumptions, and has nothing to do with the actual state of the real evidence, of which you seem blisfully unaware.

I love these bag-o-wind "I'm so smart" say nothing responses from evolutionists.

It's typical of the hollow arrogance of the entire theory.

[VadeRetro]

Admitting mistakes is a characteristic of science.

And every time science does it, the creationists contrast how "science keeps changing its story" with "the unchanging nature of The Word." ("Unchanging," that is, since the founding of whatever the One True Church happens to be for somebody.)

[js1138]

I love these bag-o-wind "I'm so smart" say nothing responses from evolutionists.

I'm still waiting for you to demonstrate you are smart enough to describe evolution in your own words.

[Seamoth]

Waiting to see natural selection in action placemarker.

[js1138]

It's been thirty minutes now. Long enough to mine some quotes describing evolution and massage them into one's own words.

[VadeRetro]

Remember that someone with your dazzling resume--thanks for posting it, BTW--and your previous vast understanding of evolution could probably provide a level of description thereof better than the standard creationist strawman. So, please, no "Goo to you, via the zoo," or "One day there was this paramecium thing and it turned into a snail and the snail turned into a rat, but where was there a female rat for it to mate with?"

[VadeRetro]

Long enough to mine some quotes describing evolution and massage them into one's own words.

Creationist googling takes longer than that, even when the creo had a 4.8 GPA on a scale of 4.

[js1138]

A 4.0 GPA. That's interesting. Mostly we hear how crappy schools and colleges are, but suddenly they are something to brag about.

[VadeRetro]

Let me with all due humility propose Vade's Rule: "If you feel that you have to post your GPA (real or fictional), it's because you've been performing conspicuously below "IDIOT."

[RunningWolf]

Hey by the way,

I followed some links, and found what I think is your web page. It had the same kitty picture in it I think have seen here, you know the kitty on the top of the couch image. Anyway nice work.

I made my own little web site years ago also 97 to 99'sh. It had a little css, some java script and a few self wrtieet java applets and full fledged java apps. Got to get one going again

I never competed in any marathons or other organized runs, but I ran marathon distances. But much more often I would run an 8 to 18 mile run depending upon number of laps around Thompson Lake after leaving the Rec Center. During the peaks of the run I was getting down into some 5 minute miles, circa 1981 1982.

Wolf

[Coyoteman]

Coming up on a big Kansas prime.

[VadeRetro]

During the peaks of the run I was getting down into some 5 minute miles, circa 1981 1982.

Out of my league. In my 30's (my best road races) I was doing very low 7s per mile. (44:13 10K at age 35.) Now 56 and being driven to distraction by foot problems, I'm lucky when I'm not doing 9 per mile. I was lucky in a road race today. 5K in 27:13 on a steambath of a morning.

[js1138]

Let me with all due humility propose Vade's Rule: "If you feel that you have to post your GPA (real or fictional), it's because you've been performing conspicuously below "IDIOT."

Does that apply to the number of distinct PhDs you claim? And the number of biotech companies you run?

[js1138]

Creationist googling takes longer than that...

I think the problem is that in order to replicate with modification, you have to know enough to recognize a credible and concise source.

[js1138]

One hour and counting...