Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fanfan

As seems to be your nature you have misrepresented what I said to suit your own purposes. I don't know whether your purpose was to be dishonest or you simply did not understand the rule of political discourse that you violated. What I said and what I stand by is as follows.

"If you find I have criticized Canadian conservative leaders as individuals or in their personal capacity than I have committed a grave error and, I would, of course apologize. If, on the other hand, my criticism is of Canadian policy or strategic choices than I think that is fair in terms of any dialog as it would be for you."


213 posted on 06/19/2006 9:50:55 AM PDT by spatso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]


To: spatso
As seems to be your nature you have misrepresented what I said to suit your own purposes.

Right back at you.......

I had been responding to this unfounded, 2nd hand accusation from you.......

When we started the mother of this thread a few weeks ago, another FReeper mailed me to say I was wasting my time. Specifically, Canadians could attack and could be critical of American policy but, they will not tolerate any negative comment about there own situation.

You posted it, so show me where I have done so.

214 posted on 06/19/2006 10:03:01 AM PDT by fanfan (I wouldn't be so angry with them if they didn't want to kill me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson