[MNJohnnie]

Utterly absurd nonsense as usual. They prostituted their "Widowhood" to act as strident Democrat Partisans. Very well, using their widowhood as justification for why their commentary on matters political was credible, they cannot then hide behind their widowhood to avoid being held to account for their actions. They gleefully used their dead husbands as political propaganda props. They have NO moral standing to now posture as victims. They picked this fight counting on their victim status to protect them from any response, too bad for them Ann has called their bluff

[bvw]

Nice take, MNJ.

In basketball they`d be called ball hogs. In the theater -- awful hams. At a society event -- obnoxious bores.

They stole and still steal the concerns of and respect for the opinions of the great majority of the families of the murdered, which as I understand differ considerably from that of the fame-deluded widows.

[org.whodat]

They prostituted their "Widowhood" to act as strident Democrat Partisans

Now that is a good line.

[Rummyfan]

They prostituted their "Widowhood" to act as strident Democrat Partisans.

Exactly! And exactly like Cindy Sheehan prostituting her 'grief' over her son for the purposes of becoming a leftie heroine.

[Smedley]

Utterly absurd nonsense as usual. They prostituted their "Widowhood" to act as strident Democrat Partisans.

If Cindy Sheehan can be criticized, then why not these women?

[Dodgers fan]

Very well said! Those NJ harpies are rolling in money. They are part of the DNC's attack team and feel that we can't respond because they are "grieving". Grieving, my tush! They are too ugly to end up in Playboy anyway.

[chiller]

They gleefully used their dead husbands as political propaganda props. They have NO moral standing to now posture as victims.

I'll second that sentiment.

[Ole Okie]

Utterly absurd nonsense as usual. They prostituted their "Widowhood" to act as strident Democrat Partisans. Very well, using their widowhood as justification for why their commentary on matters political was credible, they cannot then hide behind their widowhood to avoid being held to account for their actions.

You've said it very well. I have felt this way for years. In what way did the deaths on 9-11 suddenly confer political expertise on anyone who lost husbands, wives, or children?

A few years back, I lost my very lovely wife to a bad and rapidly acting disease.

That gave me no expertise on anything on which I hadn't had prior expertise, not even on the disease that killed her. Medical science had nothing to offer save palliative measures.

Crap happens, and that's the truth. The sympathy of the entire nation went out to those who lost loved ones on 9-11, but I got sick of hearing the same harpy voices blame Bush for something over which he had no control.

[KoRn]

"Utterly absurd nonsense as usual. They prostituted their "Widowhood" to act as strident Democrat Partisans. Very well, using their widowhood as justification for why their commentary on matters political was credible, they cannot then hide behind their widowhood to avoid being held to account for their actions. They gleefully used their dead husbands as political propaganda props. They have NO moral standing to now posture as victims. They picked this fight counting on their victim status to protect them from any response, too bad for them Ann has called their bluff"

Everything you said was true, every word! They are nothing more than political hacks being used as a tool by the Left.