Coulter calls 9/11 widows "witches" (Lying Headline from Reuters)

Reuters via Yahoo! News ^ | June 7, 2006 | Claudia Parsons

[KJC1]

Correction: Ann screwed down, and the left howled in pain. And you howled too, apparently

LOL. I don't blame you for taking that tack, there is no wind behind your sails. Just for fun, can you find one leftist comment I've made in my time here? You still haven't defended Ann's indefensible statements. Very odd, indeed. LOL.

[true_blue_texican]

..I'll take one Sowell for twenty Coulters, any day....

I'll have a filet of Sowell and for desert I'll have one Coulter.

[true_blue_texican]

Too bad Thomas Sowell doesn't use over the top rhetoric like Ann. He just uses facts and thoughtful insight and stuff. What a LOSER!

{in a smiley teacher's voice:} That's why we are not talking about him {morph to DEMON}Now somebody post some pictures dammit!!!!!!!!!!!

[ArGee]

She does us no favors and while she may effectively preach to the choir, she does little to further the cause.

I hate jumping in on post 113 when there are over 500, but I think she has actually done us a favor.

When Ann is done with her sometimes over-the-top rhetoric then I can say, "You know, we have to wonder why the widows who hate Bush become celebrities, but those who don't are ignored." If Ann hadn't drawn the fire way up over the top, then I could be attacked for questioning their "absolute moral authority." But thanks to Ann I can bring the subject up and look like a moderate doing it. What she's done is widened the spectrum so moderation is truly more in the middle.

And if she happens to get rich re-establishing the proper place of moderation, I'm not jealous.

Really, I'm not.

Shalom.

[true_blue_texican]

...non-partisan middle-of-the-road Americans...

There are really very few of these people.

[bray]

It is actually time to put an end to this thoughtcop tactic of bringing widows to the national forum. It is the old you can't win the debate so you shut it down with this victims. How dare you question _______ after what they have been through?

Their fake outrage is just another way to dehumanize her voice. Her book likely exposes the Religion of Liberalism.

Maybe this will help put an end to it?

Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters

[ArGee]

But then she is a professional, the people getting off on putting her down appear to be self-absorbed amateurs embarrassing themselves in public.

She also has editors.

Shalom.

[true_blue_texican]

...bitchy attack with her made up crap about their Husbands probably ready to divorce them...

Hey, Texas, go read my posts about HYPERBOLE!!!

[Lancey Howard]

The politically correct, safe thing to do is to be "outraged" by Coulter's comments about the scumbag "Jersey Girls" who are actually, don't you know, merely the grieving widows of men who they watched "burn to death" in the attacks of 9/11.

It certainly has been instructive around here the past two days to see who is running from Coulter like scared bunny rabbits.

[Syncro]

Very good analysis, thanks!

[One4Indictment]

I love Ann Coulter and that's that!! Oh, and btw, I just saw Chris Angell walk on water.

[ArGee]

Very good analysis, thanks!

You're welcome, but I am a bit of a liar.

I'm a tad jealous.

Shalom.

[BurbankKarl]

Gorelick didnt testify because she would be led away in handcuffs.

[STARWISE]

As Ann Coulter reminds us, they personalized it so, they completely ignore the fact that the terrorists attacked AMERICA .. it wasn't a plot to take out the Jersey girls' husbands.

[highway 90 west]

Why are Ann's comments so indefesible?

[Syncro]

Heh heh, well get out there and right a book!

With editors, of course...

[stands2reason]

I know who she is. What does she have to do with Ann's choice of ad hominem?

[stands2reason]

There is a huge difference between supporting these women and making baseless attacks on them that make them look like victims in the eyes of the clueless all over again.

If you have to resort to personal attacks, you have no argument.

[stands2reason]

Why don't you do something completely different for a change and bash a liberal instead of bashing a conservative for bashing a liberal.

I think you are confusing me with someone else, or you are misinformed.

Since when do I take it easy on liberals?

[highway 90 west]

No! Just makes the arguement a little shorter. If they are that clueless they will never get it.