Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lilylangtree
"But the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 last year to uphold the city's [of New London, not every city] right to take the homes, saying municipalities have broad power to do so in favor of private development to generate tax revenue"

That was kelo v. new london. The decision applied only to that case. This would be a new case and a judge could, instead of letting the decision stand (stare decisis), not let it stand and rule to the contrary, correcting the mistake.

And that nonsense about broad power to blah blah blah, where did that power come from? I thought this was a Republic where the will of the people is expressed through their elected representatives. The municipality has no powers that the people don't delegate to it. Instead it is becoming more of an authoritarian state where the will of the tyrant is expressed through the judges, and I just see the people bending over and accepting it.

I'm still waiting for one of these homeowners with properties in jeopardy to go postal on some city officials or their agent enforcers, and I don't mean sending letter.

8 posted on 06/06/2006 10:40:43 AM PDT by Jason_b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jason_b

The only good thing to come from this decision was that it put the issues front and center in congress and all 50 states. Unfortunately, the momentum was not enough to sustain more than a few isolated state law reforms.

Perhaps we do need another poignant example to hit the front pages. Though I'm not sure going postal would get the kind of coverage that is needed.


26 posted on 06/06/2006 1:54:46 PM PDT by KingofZion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson