[hedgetrimmer]

OH YEAH, those propsals will go down real well in the US!!

Their security plan is already being implemented. The American people will only find out about it after the fact. Notice how they hold these meetings out of the country or in very secure environments, so the true purpose of the meetings is obscured by a lack of press coverage, and the legitimate governmental requirement to record the proceedings is bypassed.

[Frank T]

"Their security plan is already being implemented."

The point I forgot to make in my post in regard to this is that the conservative position on a "secured border" is used against us in this scheme.

Who exactly wants to be against a secure perimeter? Aren't many of us calling for one along the US-Mex border? A North American security perimeter sounds, to many I would think, as some sort of mega security, and must therefore be supported.

The issue is not security alone, but soveriegnty. If Mexicans and Canadians want to be more harmonized with the US, they must lose their sovereignty, and rights, not the other way around.